“Will Supreme Court hear health mandate at all?” David G. Savage will have this article Monday in The Los Angeles Times.
And Politico.com reports that “Ben Nelson stands by his key vote.”
“Ruling on health care case hard to predict; Conservative justices could side either way”: This article will appear Monday in The Washington Times.
Today’s edition of The Tampa Bay Times contains an article headlined “Health care case puts spotlight on Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Supreme Court’s swing vote.”
Monday’s edition of The New York Times will contain an article headlined “Waiting (and Sleeping) in Line, for View of Health Care History.”
Monday’s edition of The Nashua (N.H.) Telegraph will contain an article headlined “Nashua grad setting up camp, hoping to hear Supreme Court arguments on health care.”
Columnist Robert J. Samuelson of The Washington Post has an essay entitled “Obama’s ego trip.”
And at Politico.com, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has an essay entitled “Healthy reminder of SCOTUS’s role.” In addition, former U.S. Senator Tom Daschle has an essay entitled “Killing the mandate won’t fix health care.”
“Before Health Case, Lawyers Train for Legal Marathon”: Adam Liptak will have this article Monday in The New York Times. The newspaper also has a “Room for Debate” discussion online titled “Is the Court Being Thoughtful or Partisan?”
In Monday’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes will have an article headlined “Supreme Court to hear arguments on timing of health-care ruling.”
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined “Two formidable lawyers to spar at Supreme Court over health care reform law; Two attorneys will handle the lion’s share of the arguments before the Supreme Court in the Obama health care reform case; In one corner, US Solicitor General Donald Verrilli; In the other, the indomitable Paul Clement.”
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that “Utah health care reform foes to attend landmark Supreme Court hearing.”
The Seattle Times has an article headlined “If ‘Obamacare’ falls, McKenna could pay political price; State Attorney General Rob McKenna has long said he isn’t trying to overturn the entire federal health-care law by joining a lawsuit against it; But those statements are at odds with the legal arguments plaintiffs in the case have made in McKenna’s name.”
The Guardian (UK) reports that “US healthcare reforms battle moves to supreme court; Attorney generals representing 26 states claim Barack Obama’s sweeping healthcare reforms violate the constitution.”
Jesse J. Holland of The Associated Press has articles headlined “High court has a range of personalities, styles” and “Multi-hour arguments heard at Supreme Court.” The AP also reports that “Argument up first: Is it too soon to decide?”
Bloomberg News reports that “Plouffe Says Americans Don’t Want ‘Refight’ on Health Care.” In addition, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay entitled “Supreme Court Should Heed Economic Sense on Health Care.”
Bill Mears of CNN.com has reports headlined “The U.S. Supreme Court: How it works“; “Health care’s big four issues: What the justices will tackle“; “The Supreme Court and election-year blockbusters“; “Health law opponent: ‘Congress made a bad situation worse’“; “Health law supporter: ‘It really is going to help the American public’“; and “Health care reform FAQ: A CNN guide to the Supreme Court’s arguments.”
And Monday’s edition of The Los Angeles Times will contain an editorial entitled “Healthcare law’s day in court: After numerous lower-court rulings, it’s up to the Supreme Court to find it constitutional.”
“Clash over floating home reaches US Supreme Court”: The Associated Press has this report.
“Essay: Taking its place in history…” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”
“Delays Keep Former Qaeda Child Soldier at Guantanamo, Despite Plea Deal”: Charlie Savage has this article today in The New York Times.
“Don’t Blame The Supreme Court For Citizens United — Blame Congress, The FEC And The IRS.” Dan Froomkin has this article online at The Huffington Post.
“Groups Blanket Supreme Court on Health Care”: This article appears today in The New York Times. In addition, Lincoln Caplan and Philip M. Boffey have an Editorial Observer essay entitled “A Moment of Truth for Health Care Reform.”
In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “As Supreme Court justices review health-care law, stakes will be hard to ignore.”
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined “Obama health care law at Supreme Court: mega case for the history books; US Supreme Court takes up the Obama health-care reform law starting Monday; The case puts the high court center stage in a constitutional showdown that could define the scope of congressional power for generations — and perhaps affect Obama’s reelection prospects.”
The Kansas City Star contains an article headlined “Case before Supreme Court isn’t just about health care reform; Political dispute is likely to redefine the relations between government and individuals for a long time.”
Michael Kirkland of UPI has an article headlined “Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Healthcare, at long last, reaches the justices.”
Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has an article headlined “How the legal assault on Obama’s health law went mainstream.”
Today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Weekend Edition Sunday” contained audio segments entitled “Health Care Law Heads To The High Court” and “Supreme Court Doesn’t Budge On Push For Cameras.”
The Denver Post contains articles headlined “Supreme Court arguments this week on 2-year-old health care law fan old flames of debate” and “Individual mandate a key Colorado issue as high court reviews health care act.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer contains an article headlined “Health-care reform on the docket; The Supreme Court case may determine the extent of federal power.”
The Newark (N.J.) Star-Ledger contains an article headlined “As U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments on health care bill, industry says it’s already reformed.”
The Las Vegas Sun contains an article headlined “Health care law: Legal challenge hinges on wheat, pot farmers, tax collection.”
The Detroit Free Press contains an article headlined “Michiganders divided on law reforming health care as Supreme Court takes up challenges.”
The Telegraph (UK) contains an article headlined “How nine Supreme Court justices hold health care and Barack Obama’s future in their hands — American Way: Three days of Supreme Court hearings on Barack Obama’s health care reforms will determine their future — and the president’s legacy.”
The Chicago Tribune contains an editorial entitled “Moment of decision: Nine justices, weighing health insurance mandate, will calibrate the government’s reach.”
At Reason.com, Damon W. Root has an essay entitled “The 4 Best Legal Arguments Against ObamaCare: Why the president’s sweeping health care overhaul should be struck down by the Supreme Court.”
And at Mother Jones, Kevin Drum has a blog post titled “Forget Interstate Commerce: It’s the ‘Necessary and Proper’ Clause That’s the Key to Obamacare’s Future.”
“In rejecting Supreme Court nominee Phillip Kwon, Dems send Gov. Christie a message”: The Newark Star-Ledger contains this article today.
And The Bergen Record reports today that “Liberal groups pushed to sink state Supreme Court nominee Kwon.”
“Years After Ten Commandments Fight, Ex-Justice Plans Return”: This article appears today in The New York Times.
