How Appealing



Thursday, September 13, 2012

“Errol Morris v. Janet Malcolm: The documentary filmmaker takes on the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case.” Emily Bazelon has this interview online at Slate.

Posted at 11:26 PM by Howard Bashman



“Thomas: Americans still arguing over gov’t limits.” The Associated Press has a report that begins, “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas says the same arguments the Founding Fathers fought over during the creation of the United States are still raging today.”

Posted at 9:06 AM by Howard Bashman



“Pa. Supreme Court takes up voter ID today, NAACP plans rally”: The Philadelphia Inquirer has this news update. Earlier this week, the newspaper published an article headlined “Pennsylvania Supreme Court faces key question on voter ID appeal.” And today’s newspaper contains an article headlined “Pa. Supreme Court to review districting plan.”

The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania reports today that “Pennsylvania Supreme Court will hear challenges to state’s voter ID law.”

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported earlier this week that “Voter ID case goes to Pa. Supreme Court on Thursday; Challengers attempt to delay Nov. start.”

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Challengers of voting-law changes win some battles, but outcomes still unsettled.”

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined “Voter ID law backed by Republicans faces legal test in Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices on Thursday will examine the state’s voter ID law, which was touted by a top state Republican as allowing Mitt Romney ‘to win the state.’

Bloomberg News reports that “Pennsylvania Top Court Set to Hear Voter-ID Law Case.”

Reuters reports that “National debate over voter ID moves to Pennsylvania high court.”

And The Associated Press reports that “Pennsylvania Supreme Court to air legislative redistricting challenges.”

Posted at 8:57 AM by Howard Bashman



“Under new Supreme Court ruling, Pa. high court ponders fates of teen lifers”: Joseph A. Slobodzian has this article today in The Philadelphia Inquirer.

The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania reports today that “Pa. justices wrestle with sentencing of juvenile killers; With U.S. Supreme Court’s ban on automatic life-without-parole sentences, Pa. court looks for guidance on how to handle killers such as Easton’s Batts.”

The Philadelphia Daily News reports that “Pa.’s high court grapples with federal decision on sentencing juveniles.”

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that “Mandatory life sentences challenged by juvenile offenders.”

And The Associated Press reports that “Pa. Supreme Court weighing new sentences for juvenile killers.”

Posted at 8:40 AM by Howard Bashman