“Federal Form for Voting Is Ruled Valid”: Erik Eckholm will have this article in Saturday’s edition of The New York Times.

My earlier coverage of today’s Tenth Circuit ruling appears at this link.

“Gay marriage advocates target U.S. Supreme Court after loss”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Both sides eager for Supreme Court fight on gay marriage.”

“U.S. Supreme Court issues stay on ban of Prop. 100”: Michael Kiefer of The Arizona Republic has a news update that begins, “A U.S. Supreme Court justice on Friday issued a stay of a federal appeals court ruling that knocked down an Arizona law that denies bond to undocumented immigrants accused of serious crimes.”

And Howard Fischer of The Arizona Daily Star has a news update headlined “Reversal of Arizona’s immgrant no-bail law blocked.”

You can access the stay order that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy issued today at this link.

“Baylor, and N.C.A.A., Have Starr on Their Side; Amateurism Has an Influential Friend in Baylor’s Kenneth Starr”: Marc Tracy will have this article in Saturday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Should Courts Postpone Politically Salient Decisions?” Richard M. Re has this post today at “Re’s Judicata.”

“Dramatic turnover continues on Delaware Supreme Court”: Tom Hals of Reuters has this report.

“Q and A: A Case of Economics and Politics.” In Saturday’s edition of The New York Times, Robert Pear will have an article that begins, “When the Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a new challenge to the Affordable Care Act, it caused concern for many people who support the law, which has provided health insurance to more than 10 million.”

Online at Bloomberg View, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay titled “Supreme Court’s Next Chance to Kill Obamacare.”

Online at The Los Angeles Times, John Healey has an essay titled “The Supreme Court gives itself a second chance to kill Obamacare.”

At The Washington Post’s “Wonkblog,” Jason Millman has an entry titled “The Supreme Court is one step closer to torpedoing Obamacare.”

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Jonathan H. Adler has a post titled “Why did the court grant cert in King v. Burwell?”

“Court upholds dismissal of religious discrimination lawsuit against Northwestern in Chabad House disaffiliation”: The Daily Northwestern has this report on an interesting ruling that Circuit Judge Richard A. Posner issued yesterday on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Will Baude has a related post titled “Why did the judge announce his ‘religious inclinations’?”

“Loretta Lynch, Federal Prosecutor, to Be Nominated as Attorney General”: The New York Times has this news update.

“Appeals court revives Alaska suit on roadless rule”: The Associated Press has this report.

And Bloomberg News reports that “Alaska Lawsuit Over Roadless Forest Land Revived by Court.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit at this link.

“Breaking: 10th Circuit, in Major Voting Case, Rejects Kansas and Arizona Citizenship Proof Requirement.” At his “Election Law Blog,” Rick Hasen has this post about a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued today.

“Chief Judge Diane Wood and Judge Kent Jordan on the Constitutional Legacy of James Madison”: The National Constitution Center has posted this video online at YouTube.

“Unprecedented ruling strikes ESA protections on private land”: Jeremy P. Jacobs of Greenwire has a report that begins, “A federal judge this week struck down a government prohibition on harming the threatened Utah prairie dog on private property, setting up a potential constitutional showdown on the reach of the Endangered Species Act.”

“Third Circuit Judge Anthony Scirica outlines potential threats to judicial independence in Madison Lecture”: New York University School of Law has issued this news release. You can view the video of the remarks on YouTube via this link.

“U.S. death penalty is broken, judge says”: The Cornell Chronicle has this report.

“Supreme Court to Hear New Challenge to Health Law”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news update.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has a news update headlined “Supreme Court will hear newest challenge to Affordable Care Act.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has a news update headlined “Supreme Court to again decide fate of Obama’s healthcare law.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has a news update headlined “Supreme Court to Hear Case on Health Law Subsidies; Challengers Argue Affordable Care Act Only Permits Tax Credits on State-Run Exchange.” You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court will hear new case challenging Obamacare.”

Tom Howell Jr. of The Washington Times has a news update headlined “Supreme Court to hear Obamacare case over subsidies; could redefine the law.”

Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico.com reports that “Supreme Court to hear Obamacare subsidies case.”

Sahil Kapur of TPM DC reports that “Supreme Court Will Hear Lawsuit Aimed At Crippling Obamacare.”

The Hill reports that “Supreme Court to hear healthcare law challenge.”

Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed reports that “Supreme Court To Take Up Obamacare Subsidies Case; The justices agree to hear challenge by conservatives to subsidies under the federal health exchange.”

And Vox.com reports that “Obamacare is headed back to the Supreme Court.”

“Justices to hear health law subsidies challenge”: The Associated Press has this report.

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Challenge to Obamacare Gets U.S. Supreme Court Review.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare subsidies case.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Court to rule on health care subsidies.”

You can access today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.

“Legacy Time: What Obama can accomplish in two years without any cooperation from Congress.” Law professor Eric Posner has this essay online at Slate.

“An Unexpected Triumph for Justice: Conservatives spent millions this election cycle trying to unseat progressive judges — and they lost every time.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“President Obama expected to nominate Loretta Lynch as Attorney General”: Evan Perez of CNN.com has this report.

“Federal appeals judge is swing vote on key issue”: The Associated Press has this report.

“On Marriage Equality, a Blessing Well Disguised”: Kenneth Jost has this post today at his blog, “Jost On Justice.”

And at The Economist’s “Democracy in America” blog, Steven Mazie has a post titled “Same-sex marriage and the courts: Closer to crunch time for gay marriage.”

“Analysis: Paths to same-sex marriage review.” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Time to rethink Montana Supreme Court contests”: This editorial appears in today’s edition of The Billings Gazette.

“How One Lawyer’s Crusade Could Change Football Forever”: Michael Sokolove will have this article in this upcoming Sunday’s edition of The New York Times Magazine.

“A ‘circuit split’ will force a ruling on gay marriage”: Michael McGough has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times.

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Ilya Somin has a post titled “Assessing the Sixth Circuit decision upholding the constitutionality of laws banning same-sex marriage.”

“State attorney general weighs releasing emails of Supreme Court justices”: In today’s edition of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Karen Langley has an article that begins, “A spokeswoman for Attorney General Kathleen Kane says the office is reviewing requests this week that it release thousands of emails between justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the attorney general’s office.”