How Appealing



Wednesday, December 5, 2012

C-SPAN’s Book TV has posted online the video of a discussion about the U.S. Supreme Court featuring authors Clare Cushman, Anthony Franze, Todd Peppers, Jeffrey Toobin, and Artemus Ward: Tony Mauro, Supreme Court correspondent for The National Law Journal, served as the discussion‘s moderator. You can view the video by clicking here.

Posted at 10:28 PM by Howard Bashman



“Court gets new, more basic marriage case”: At “SCOTUSbog,” Lyle Denniston has a post that begins, “Lawyers for a group defending Nevada’s ban on same-sex marriage asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday afternoon to decide the most basic constitutional question in that controversy: must a state allow gays and lesbians to get married.”

Posted at 8:11 PM by Howard Bashman



“The Opening for a Fresh ObamaCare Challenge: By defining the mandate as a tax, one that will not be uniformly applied, the Supreme Court ran afoul of the Constitution.” David B. Rivkin and Lee A. Casey will have this op-ed Thursday in The Wall Street Journal.

Posted at 8:02 PM by Howard Bashman



“Circuit Split Watch: Press Access Not a Slam Dunk.” Michelle Olsen has this post today at her “Appellate Daily” blog.

Posted at 2:55 PM by Howard Bashman



“Frustrating (and telling) myopia concerning criminal justice among SCOTUS elite”: Douglas A. Berman has this post today at his “Sentencing Law and Policy” blog.

Posted at 2:47 PM by Howard Bashman



“Michigan Supreme Court Campaign Credits Facebook Ads With Margin of Victory; Can Social-Media Ads Win An Election?” Ad Age has this blog post.

Posted at 2:37 PM by Howard Bashman



“Fast-track effort on new race case”: At “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post that begins, “Lawyers for Michigan, moving rapidly with a new case on the use of race in college admissions, have laid out a plan to get the Supreme Court to hear and decide the case in the current Term.” You can view the petition for writ of certiorari at this link.

Posted at 2:25 PM by Howard Bashman



“Court hears challenge to Obama recess appointments”: The Associated Press has a report that begins, “A federal appeals court heard arguments Wednesday in a case that considers whether President Barack Obama violated the Constitution earlier this year when he bypassed the Senate to fill vacancies in his administration.”

Bloomberg News reports that “Republican Lawmakers Argue Obama Appointments Unlawful.”

And David Ingram of Reuters reports that “Court asked to invalidate Obama recess appointments.”

Posted at 2:20 PM by Howard Bashman