How Appealing



Tuesday, February 28, 2006

“Could abortion law affect tourism? Both sides say yes.” This article appears today in The Argus Leader of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Today’s edition of USA Today contains an editorial entitled “Emboldened, abortion foes attack ‘Roe’ head-on; S.D. abortion ban also opens door to a broader assault on privacy” and an op-ed by Roger Hunt entitled “Our time has come: S.D. part of nationwide momentum to fight for rights of unborn babies.”

And columnist Cal Thomas has an essay entitled “Swinging for the fences on abortion.”

Posted at 10:50 AM by Howard Bashman



Today’s U.S. Supreme Court opinions in argued cases: The Court today issued two opinions in argued cases. Because these cases were argued before Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. reached the Court, he did not participate in either decision.

1. Today’s first ruling issued in the case of Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., No. 04-1244, and Justice Stephen G. Breyer delivered the opinion on behalf of a unanimous Court. You can access the syllabus here; Justice Breyer’s opinion here; and the oral argument transcript here.

2. Today’s second ruling issued in the case of Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, No. 04-805. Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion on behalf of a unanimous Court. You can access the syllabus here; Justice Thomas’s opinion here; and the oral argument transcript here.

In early press coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court Backs Abortion Protesters” and “Supreme Court Throws Out Gas Prices Suit.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Court limits Hobbs Act.”

Posted at 10:04 AM by Howard Bashman



“Panel Weighs Opinions on Publishing Opinions”: CalLaw.com’s “Legal Pad” blog provides a post that begins, “A Supreme Court committee may be ready to nudge the judiciary to soften its long-held presumption that most appellate decisions should not be published. The Advisory Committee on Rules for Publication of Court of Appeal Opinions, chaired by Supreme Court Justice Kathryn Werdegar, asked for comments Thursday on whether the rule that discourages publication should be changed to advocate it if one of nine criteria is met.”

The request for comments can be accessed here, while the proposed rule amendment and the form on which comments can be provided are available at this link.

Posted at 9:58 AM by Howard Bashman



“Ex-Playmate Smith Faces Supreme Court”: Gina Holland of The Associated Press provides a report that begins, “Dressed in all black, former stripper turned weight-loss promoter Anna Nicole Smith fought her way through a throng of photographers and autograph-seekers Tuesday on her way to a Supreme Court showdown in her bid to inherit her late husband’s fortune. Smith didn’t say a word and didn’t sign any autographs as she and a lawyer tried to slip into a side door of the court.”

Posted at 9:50 AM by Howard Bashman



“Enron trial heats up; A former top accountant at the company’s energy trading unit tells of uncertain accounting methods; ex-trader Tim Belden to testify next”: CNNMoney.com provides this report.

Posted at 9:44 AM by Howard Bashman



“Anna Nicole Smith to Face Supreme Court”: Gina Holland of The Associated Press provides this report.

The Houston Chronicle today contains an editorial entitled “Make her go away! Like her trashy reality show, the Anna Nicole Smith legal saga has gotten stale and badly needs a finale.”

And in USA Today, Law Professor Jonathan Turley has an op-ed that begins, “Lap dances, wills and — you: Anna Nicole Smith gets her day in court today; Laugh all you want, but the former stripper’s lawsuit could reshape the nation’s probate law.”

Posted at 7:25 AM by Howard Bashman



“Amid the abortion rifts, a history of court shifts”: Columnist Peter S. Canellos has this essay today in The Boston Globe.

Posted at 7:18 AM by Howard Bashman