The wonderful thing about Tigger socks: Today in The San Francisco Chronicle, Demian Bulwa and Bob Egelko have an article headlined “Fighting for the right to wear Tigger: ACLU sues Napa school over dress code that requires solid colors, bans all denim.”

And The Napa Valley Register provides a news update headlined “Tigger clothing ban causes family to sue school district.”

“Break up the FBI: The agency is too large and bureaucratic to effectively fight terrorism.” Law Professor John Yoo has this op-ed today in The Los Angeles Times.

“Carefully drawn line”: Today in The Washington Times, Daniel Gallington has an op-ed that begins, “Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said last week that while he believed that homosexuality was ‘immoral,’ he supported the Defense Department’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy.”

And today in The Chicago Tribune, columnist Clarence Page has an op-ed entitled “Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t leave.”

“Bullet Points: The People Debate Fate Of Gun Ban.” This article appears today in The Washington Post.

“F.B.I. Is Warned Over Its Misuse of Data Collection”: The New York Times contains this article today.

The Washington Post reports today that “FBI Violations May Number 3,000, Official Says.”

And The Washington Times reports that “FBI hit for misuse of spying power.”

“Lawyers Press Musharraf With Protests; Clash Over Judge Grows Into Challenge of Pakistani Leader’s Rule”: This front page article appears today in The Washington Post.

“The White House and Congress Seem Headed Toward a Familiar Collision”: Adam Liptak has this news analysis today in The New York Times. The newspaper also contains articles headlined “Ousted California Prosecutor Previously Had Disputes on Strategy” and “Attorneys’ Case Will Be Subject of Political Ad.” An editorial is entitled “What People Really Need.” And David C. Iglesias has an op-ed entitled “Why I Was Fired.”

The Los Angeles Times today contains articles headlined “Bush clashes with Congress over U.S. attorney firings; He refuses to let Rove testify. Democrats say they will issue subpoenas” and “Making a list of reasons for firing U.S. attorneys: Justice Department memos show performance issues were being detailed after the fact in order to justify the terminations.”

The Chicago Tribune reports that “Bush takes tough line on firings; Aides can talk to Congress, but not under oath.” An editorial is entitled “Not distinguished, eh?” And columnist John Kass has an op-ed entitled “Connecting dots and Fitzgerald’s fall.”

The Boston Globe reports that “Bush, Democrats clash on prosecutors; President backs AG, refuses call for aides to testify.” And Thomas M. Boyd has an op-ed entitled “The US attorney mess.”

USA Today contains a front page article headlined “Bush defiant in prosecutors probe; Vows constitutional battle to prevent aides’ testimony.” In addition, Ross K. Baker has an op-ed entitled “Dismissals of U.S. attorneys fit Bush pattern: Bypass Congress.”

The Washington Times reports that “Bush to fight Democratic subpoenas.”

And in The Washington Post, Al Kamen’s “In the Loop” column is headlined “The Ritual Dance of the Prosecutors.”

“Ex-Captive in Guantanamo Makes Run for Office in Australia”: The New York Times contains this article today.

“Protect student speech — even ‘unwise’ bong banner; Precedent, common sense favor student in Supreme Court case”: This editorial appears today in USA Today.

In response, Kenneth W. Starr has an op-ed entitled “Policy reflects common sense; Principal should have right to stop drug-promoting publicity stunt.”

And The Washington Post today contains an editorial entitled “Precedent 4 Student Speech: An unusual First Amendment case.”

“Analysis: Impetus from an Enron ruling?” Lyle Denniston has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“New Technique Lets Bloggers Tackle Late-Night News Dumps”: Josh Gerstein has this article today in The New York Sun.