How Appealing



Wednesday, April 18, 2007

“0-for-2: Linda Greenhouse gets both Rehnquist and Roberts wrong.” Adam J. White has this essay online today at The Weekly Standard.

Posted at 8:45 AM by Howard Bashman



“U.S. Supreme Court to consider mental illness in case of Texas inmate; At issue is whether man convicted of killing in-laws should be spared because he cannot grasp that execution is penalty for his crime”: The Austin American-Statesman contains this article today.

Posted at 8:23 AM by Howard Bashman



“Worker retaliation can be ‘hostile’: The Supreme Court was wrong to pass up an opportunity to let a whistle-blower sue.” This editorial appears today in The Los Angeles Times.

Posted at 8:15 AM by Howard Bashman



“Supreme Court rules states can’t regulate subsidiaries of national banks”: Joan Biskupic has this article today in USA Today.

The Los Angeles Times reports today that “Subsidiaries exempt from state control; The Supreme Court says oversight of units of national banks, like their parents, belongs to a federal agency.”

And The Charlotte Observer reports today that “Supreme Court rules for Wachovia; National bank subsidiaries under federal watch.”

Posted at 8:14 AM by Howard Bashman



“Potential Padilla jurors admit bias; Many cite 9/11, saying they would struggle to treat a Muslim impartially in a terrorism trial”: The Los Angeles Times contains this article today.

Posted at 8:09 AM by Howard Bashman



“Judges Hear Arguments In Pat-Down Case”: The Tampa Tribune today contains an article that begins, “When a high school civics teacher allowed security guards to search him with a quick pat-down at three Tampa Bay Buccaneers games, did he waive his constitutional right protecting him from unreasonable searches? In two previous courtrooms, a state judge and a federal judge focused on whether pat-down searches of ticket holders at Raymond James Stadium were a violation of the state and U.S. constitutions. In both cases, the judges issued injunctions that now ban the physical searches at Bucs games. The Tampa Sports Authority, with funding from the National Football League, took the case to a federal appeals court. In Miami on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals focused on whether the Tampa Sports Authority, the government body that runs the stadium, had a contractual right to refuse ticket holders entrance to the stadium if they declined to be searched.”

Posted at 7:58 AM by Howard Bashman



“Appeals court rules Posada should be freed on bond”: The El Paso Times today contains an article that begins, “The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals renewed Luis Posada Carriles’ hopes that he could be released on bond when it ruled Tuesday to deny the prosecutors’ appeal of the bond, court documents and Posada’s Florida lawyers said. Posada, 79, an alleged Cuban terrorist, was allowed a $250,000 bond April 6 in El Paso by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone.”

And The Miami Herald reports today that “Posada closer to moving to Miami; A jailed anti-Castro activist could be released this week after his latest court victory — if immigration authorities don’t detain him before his criminal trial in Texas.”

Posted at 7:55 AM by Howard Bashman



“A Federal Court of Appeals Gets it Wrong on Birth Control: Why Contraceptive Exclusions in Health Coverage Discriminate Against Women.” Sherry F. Colb has this essay online today at FindLaw.

Posted at 6:37 AM by Howard Bashman