“Supreme Court case tests FCC’s power to police TV indecency”: Robert Barnes will have this article Monday in The Washington Post.

“Sullivan v. DB Investments – The Third Circuit Takes on the Supreme Court (and Itself)”: Andrew J. Trask has this post at the “Class Action Countermeasures” blog.

“Obama, health care foes prepare for high court; Arguments about law likely to be heard in late March”: The Washington Times has this news update.

“Texas electoral maps at issue before Supreme Court”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

And Michael Kirkland of UPI has an article headlined “Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Administration, Texas crack heads in high court.”

“Staunton suspect’s case raises questions about police use of GPS”: The News Leader of Staunton, Virginia contains this article today.

“Supreme Court to hear Texas redistricting case; Court expected to rule on which map to use, discuss Voting Rights Act”: This article appears today in The Austin American-Statesman.

The San Antonio Express-News reports today that “Texas redistricting clash is back in a familiar venue; Monday won’t be first time U.S. Supreme Court has heard similar arguments from the state.”

And The Dallas Morning News reports that “Supreme Court hearing Texas redistricting case could take up Voting Rights Act, too.”

“Arizona shootings: Year to honor Judge John Roll.” The Arizona Republic contains this article today.

“Respected judge, litigator retires from the fray”: This article appears today in The Philadelphia Inquirer.

“My Guantanamo Nightmare”: Lakhdar Boumediene will have this op-ed Sunday in The New York Times.

“Court reverses conviction of Super Bowl plotter; A man who sent a letter to news media explaining a planned shooting rampage at an Arizona stadium didn’t violate a law against threatening people, an appeals panel rules”: Carol J. Williams has this article today in The Los Angeles Times.

And The Arizona Republic reports today that “9th Circuit affirms conviction reversal in 2008 Super Bowl threat.”

“Idaho couple heads to Supreme Court to defend home from EPA”: Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers has this report.

“Breyer wades into Supreme Court ethics debate”: The Associated Press has this report.

“Argument preview: Texas, the courts, and minority voters.” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Study Challenges Supreme Court’s Image as Defender of Free Speech”: Adam Liptak will have this article Sunday in The New York Times.

“Sen. Menendez questions qualifications of federal magistrate”: The Newark (N.J.) Star-Ledger contains this front page article today.

And The Philadelphia Inquirer reports today that “Menendez denies opposition to appointment is political payback.”

“Debate Over Appointees Hinges On One Word: Recess.” This audio segment appeared on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Weekend Edition Saturday.”

“When Property Rights, Environmental Laws Collide”: Nina Totenberg had this audio segment on today’s broadcast of “Weekend Edition Saturday.”

“Jan. 8 victim recalled warmly as tireless, bighearted jurist”: This article appears today in The Arizona Daily Star.

And today’s broadcast of “Weekend Edition Saturday” contained an audio segment entitled “An Emotional Year After The Tucson Shooting.”

“Senator Says His Concerns With Nominee Aren’t Personal”: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, “Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey denied Friday that he was blocking an Obama administration nominee to a federal judgeship because of a grudge against her longtime companion, who led a corruption investigation of the senator during his tough election fight of 2006.”

“Administration to high court: Congress acted within rights on health-care law.” Robert Barnes has this article today in The Washington Post.

CNN.com reports that “White House, GOP senators file health care law arguments.”

And National Journal reports that “U.S. Makes Its Case for Health Care Law.”

“Court: Super Bowl massacre letters weren’t threats.” Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this news update.

My earlier coverage of today’s en banc Ninth Circuit ruling appears here and here.

“Feds: Judge’s ruling destroyed case against alleged leaker.” Josh Gerstein has this blog post at Politico.com.

“New briefs preview Supreme Court clash over health care”: The Washington Times has this news update.

Ariane de Vogue of ABC News has a blog post titled “Obama Administration Forcefully Defends Health Care Law’s Individual Mandate.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Health care debate reopens.”

“Supreme Court to rule on drug-sniffing dog case; Florida justices had ruled against the use of such dogs to detect marijuana at the door of a home without evidence of criminal activity; The high court will hear an appeal”: David G. Savage will have this article Saturday in The Los Angeles Times.

And in Saturday’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes will have an article headlined “Supreme Court to review use of drug-sniffing dog at the front door of a house.”

“Texas election map fight goes before Supreme Court”: James Vicini of Reuters has this report.

“Obama Administration Files Brief Defending Health Care Law Individual Mandate With Supreme Court”: Mike Sacks of The Huffington Post has this report.

“Does drug dog sniff outside home violate privacy? Supreme Court takes case; The Supreme Court will examine a case in which a drug dog signaled the presence of narcotics after being brought to the door of a home; A warrant was obtained, and growing marijuana was found.” Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has this report.

“Jared Loughner’s lonely world before attack”: This front page article appears today in The Arizona Republic.

USA Today has a news update headlined “Anniversary of Giffords shooting in Arizona reopens wounds.”

And The Associated Press reports that “Trial not likely for Jared Lee Loughner in 2012.”

“Gov’t defends core of health care overhaul”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, “The Obama administration defended the health care overhaul in a filing Friday with the Supreme Court that calls the law an appropriate response to a ‘crisis in the national health care market.'”

James Vicini of Reuters reports that “Obama lawyers defend healthcare law in Supreme Court.”

And Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Obama Lawyers Defend Health-Care Law at U.S. High Court.”

“David Wecht sworn in as Superior Court judge”: This article appeared yesterday in The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

“Oracle can’t appeal SAP order right away-judge”: Dan Levine of Reuters has this report.

“Big business backs David against EPA’s Goliath in wetlands fight”: Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire has this report.

“U.S. files brief”: The “aca litigation blog” has this post and provides this link to the federal government’s brief filed today in the U.S. Supreme Court in defense of the federal healthcare mandate.

“Court tosses conviction for Super Bowl threats”: Terry Baynes of Reuters has this report.

My earlier coverage of today’s en banc Ninth Circuit ruling appears at this link.

“So much for Plan B: Kaplan denies Chevron attachment motion.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “NY judge declines to halt $18B Ecuadorean judgment.”