“BFFs Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia agree to disagree”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

Access online today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court granted review today in one new case.

And in Carlton v. United States, No. 14-8740, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement, in which Justice Stephen G. Breyer joined, respecting the denial of certiorari.

In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “High court to hear dispute over gov’t contracts to veterans“; “High court won’t hear Ford appeal of tax overpayment“; “Court won’t hear appeal on recovery for Madoff victims“; and “High court rejects appeal from general denied promotion.”

And Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme Court turns down Ford in $470 million tax dispute“; “Supreme Court rejects Madoff trustee’s appeal over $4 billion recovery“; and “U.S. Supreme Court rejects Google patent appeal over Street View.”

“The Destruction of Defendants’ Rights”: Lincoln Caplan has this post online at The New Yorker.

“Some central Ohio clergy are eager to marry gay couples”: The Columbus Dispatch has this report.

“U.S. Supreme Court on brink of deciding gay marriage question”: Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this report.

Todd Spangler of The Detroit Free Press reports that “Same-sex ruling will trigger next round of fights.”

Jessica Parks of The Philadelphia Inquirer has an article headlined “Supreme Court on gay marriage: A foregone conclusion?”

Markus Schmidt of The Richmond Times-Dispatch has an article headlined “Gay marriage: A look at key questions ahead of ruling.”

The Cincinnati Enquirer has an articles headlined “Obergefell’s routine: ‘Sitting there being nervous’” and “Small-town Indiana judge and gay marriage? No problem.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has an article headlined “Turmoil Only Sure Thing If Supreme Court Rejects Gay Marriage: Questions could be raised about tens of thousands of unions across the country, and more legal fights would likely follow.”

And Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed has an article headlined “The 2005 Decision To Go Forward With The Fight For Marriage Equality.”

“Partisan agreement in the supreme court”: Eric Posner has this blog post today, in addition to a blog post titled “Cross-party agreement in the supreme court.”

“Looking for change in all the wrong Supreme Court cases”: John Blake of CNN.com has this report.

“Washington whipped into frenzy ahead of ObamaCare ruling”: Sarah Ferris of The Hill has this report.

In Monday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Stephanie Armour will have an article headlined “Insurers, Hospitals Brace for Affordable Care Act Ruling; Hospitals, doctors and consumers prepare for fallout if the Supreme Court strikes down subsidies that help 6.4 million Americans buy insurance.” You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

And The Kansas City Star reports that “With ACA ruling near, health insurance for millions hangs in the balance.”

“Solitary Confinement: Cruel but Not Unusual.” Kenneth Jost has this post today at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“Appeals court affirms GNC, Rite Aid win on joint-supplement ads”: Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued on Friday.

“Parsing the Clues Ahead of the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Decision”: Cristian Farias has this post today at the “Daily Intelligencer” blog of New York magazine.

“Justice Anthony Kennedy Might Use a Conservative Principle to Save Obamacare; Here are the three most likely outcomes in the Supreme Court case”: Simon Lazarus has this essay online today at The New Republic.

“Health Insurers Brace for Supreme Court Ruling”: Reed Abelson will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

Also in Monday’s edition of The New York Times, Abby Goodnough will have an article headlined “States Take Few Steps to Fill Gap if Supreme Court Blocks Health Subsidies.”

“Kennedy’s Gay-Rights Rulings Seen in His Sacramento Roots”: Sheryl Gay Stolberg will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Why does President Obama criticize the Supreme Court so much?” Greg Jaffe of The Washington Post has an article that begins, “President Obama seemed to relish the chance to take yet another swipe at the Supreme Court justices who were deliberating a case that could determine the fate of his landmark health-care law.”

“Texas abortion law teed up for Supreme Court review”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“The Supreme Court Is About to Decide the Fate of Housing Segregation; Any day now, the Justices could hand down a ruling on a case that asks whether states can keep their poorest residents concentrated in the worst neighborhoods”: Alana Semuels has this essay online today at The Atlantic.

“Tensions build as Supreme Court readies blockbuster rulings”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

“Legal arguments that could sway Supreme Court on Affordable Care Act”: David G. Savage and Noam N. Levey of The Los Angeles Times have this report.

“Justice Kennedy practically invites a challenge to solitary confinement”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

And today’s edition of The New York Times contains an editorial titled “Justice Kennedy on Solitary Confinement.”

“Iowa Court Ruling Says Doctors Can Prescribe Abortion Drugs by Video”: Abby Goodnough has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times reports that “Iowa court clears way for telemedicine abortions; OKs dispensing of pills after webcam talk with doctor.”

My earlier coverage of yesterday’s Iowa Supreme Court ruling appears at this link.

“Texas abortion case reaches the Court”: Lyle Denniston has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Better Judgment”: In tomorrow’s edition of The New York Times Magazine, Emily Bazelon will have an article that begins, “Nearly 100 years ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. stood at an upright desk in his study, dipped a pen into an inkwell inherited from his father and wrote a Supreme Court opinion allowing the government to imprison people for speaking out against World War I.”

“John Roberts: Restrained or not?” Adam B. Lerner of Politico.com has this report.

“You Will Be Assimilated: The same-sex marriage bait-and-switch.” Jonathan V. Last has this cover story in the June 22, 2015 issue of The Weekly Standard.

“SCOTUSblog on camera: Jeffrey Rosen (Part five).” You can access the video of the interview — the fifth of five parts — via this link.

“20 Years in a Windowless Cell: Justice Kennedy finally figures out that solitary confinement is cruel and unusual.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Empathy”: Today at “Balkinization,” Joseph Fishkin has a blog post that begins, “At the time of Justice Sotomayor’s nomination, there was much controversy about President Obama’s assertion that ’empathy’ was an important quality to look for in a Supreme Court justice.”

“The 2014 Term & the First Amendment — Surprising twists & turns”: Ronald Collins has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Appeals court declines to delay ruling on Texas abortion law”: Chuck Lindell of The Austin American-Statesman has this news update.

Brian M. Rosenthal of The Houston Chronicle has a news update headlined “Court declines to delay ruling that could close Texas abortion clinics.”

The Texas Tribune reports that “5th Circuit Won’t Halt New Texas Abortion Restrictions.”

And Laurel Brubaker Calkins of Bloomberg News reports that “Texas Abortion Clinics Lose Bid to Remain Open Past July 1.”

I have posted at this link the stay denial order that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued today.

“How Government Stifled Reason’s Free Speech: Yes, the feds can compel magazines and websites to cough up user information about obviously non-threatening trolls, while barring them from even acknowledging it.” Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch have this post today at Reason’s “Hit & Run” blog.

“Ohio v. Clark: Some Initial Thoughts.” Richard D. Friedman has this post today at “The Confrontation Blog.”

“Bad News for Sign Laws”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“Court upholds gay divorce from Travis County”: Chuck Lindell of The Austin American-Statesman has a news update that begins, “The Texas Supreme Court declined Friday to overturn a Travis County court ruling granting a divorce to two women who had married in Massachusetts.”

The Houston Chronicle has a news update headlined “Texas Supreme Court upholds same-sex divorce.”

The Dallas Morning News has a blog post titled “Texas Supreme Court upholds Austin judge’s grant of divorce to two lesbians.”

The Texas Tribune has a report headlined “Court: Texas AG Cannot Halt Same-Sex Couple’s Divorce.”

Reuters reports that “Texas Supreme Court allows same-sex divorce.”

And The Associated Press reports that “Texas Supreme Court upholds divorce of same-sex couple.”

Today’s 5-to-3 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas (with one justice not participating) consists of a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and two dissenting opinions (here and here).

“Death Penalty Splits the Court”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.