“Supreme Court Rejects 2 Antitrust Cases”: Steve Lohr will have this article in Wednesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Gun rights in California: Court uncertain about concealed carry laws.” Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has this report.

And at her “Trial Insider” blog, Pamela A. MacLean has a post titled “Gun Advocates Grilled on Concealed Carry Challenge.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has posted online on YouTube at this link the video of today’s reargument en banc before an 11-judge panel in Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego. Attorney Paul D. Clement argued the appeal on behalf of Peruta.

In earlier coverage, Southern California Public Radio 89.3 KPCC previewed the oral argument in a report titled “CA Court of Appeals hears concealed-carry case, gun rights and restrictions at stake.”

The Rocky Hill Patch has an article headlined “Rocky Hill Man at Center of High-Profile Case; Edward Peruta is the lead plaintiff in a federal lawsuit that seeks to overturn California’s system of issuing concealed-weapon permits.”

And Dave Gilson of Mother Jones recently had an article headlined “Meet the F-Bomb-Spewing Ex-Cop Behind the NRA’s Move to Topple California’s Gun Laws; ‘You don’t like it? Change the fuckin’ Constitution!’ says Edward Peruta.”

“American Express loses emergency bid to block U.S. card injunction”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has a report that begins, “A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected American Express Co’s emergency request to halt an injunction that requires the company to let merchants steer customers toward lower-cost cards offered by competitors.”

“Appeals court halts state prosecutions of Utes for crimes on tribal land”: The Salt Lake Tribune has this news update.

And Ben Winslow of Fox 13 in Salt Lake City reports that “10th Circuit Court says Utah counties can’t prosecute people for crimes on tribal lands.”

Circuit Judge Neil M. Gorsuch issued today’s decision on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

“Activists fighting to free Lolita tell court that feds ‘rubber stamp’ Seaquarium license”: In March 2015, David Ovalle of The Miami Herald had an article that begins, “The government ‘rubber stamps’ the license for the Miami Seaquarium despite the park keeping Lolita the killer whale in inhumane conditions, an animal rights group told a federal appeals court Tuesday.”

Yesterday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued this ruling affirming the entry of summary judgment dismissing the activists’ suit.

“Supreme Court Takes a Pass on Reach of U.S. Antitrust Law”: Brent Kendall had this post yesterday at WSJ.com’s “Law Blog.”

“Radcliffe Day 2015: The Roberts Court, from 2005 to Today.” Harvard University has posted this video online today at YouTube.

“A Judge’s Judge”: Today at “Dorf on Law,” law professor Eric Segall has a post that begins, “The 27th floor view of the sun glistening off Lake Michigan is simply stunning. In front of shelves lined with over forty of his own books, Judge Richard Posner shakes my hand warmly.” The post describes the week that Segall spent shadowing Judge Posner.

“Prosecutor Cleared on Blogging About Activist”: Courthouse News Service has this report.

At “Patterico’s Pontifications,” Patrick Frey has a post titled “Ninth Circuit Issues Nadia Naffe Opinion.”

And at “Popehat,” Ken White has a post titled “Partial Victory In Patterico’s Free Speech Case Before Ninth Circuit.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

“Federal appeals court rules lawsuit alleging corruption, discrimination in Mocksville police dept. can go to trial”: The Winston-Salem Journal has this report on the ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Case on Pre-Abortion Ultrasounds”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court lets stand ruling that struck down N.C. abortion law.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court declines to hear appeal of North Carolina abortion law.”

The News & Observer of Raleigh, North Carolina reports that “US Supreme Court declines to take up the NC ultrasound law.”

And The Charlotte Observer reports that “US Supreme Court refuses to review NC abortion ruling.”

“High court says immigration deadlines can be extended”: The Associated Press has this report.

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Reyes Mata v. Lynch, No. 14-185, at this link.

“High court rules against law firm in bankruptcy fee fight”: The Associated Press has this report.

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC, No. 14-103, at this link.

“Why Indeed?: A Few Words in Favor of Per Curiams.” Paul Horwitz had this post yesterday at “PrawfsBlawg.”

“Justices’ Words Are Combed for Clues as Major Decisions Loom at Court”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Justices Uphold Denial of Visa to Afghan Husband of American Woman”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Justices say it’s enough to cite terrorism in declining visa applicant.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Fremont woman loses Supreme Court appeal to get visa for Afghan husband.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Justices say U.S. citizen cannot appeal Afghan husband’s visa denial.”

Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle reports that “Fremont woman loses bid to learn why husband denied a visa.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Challenges to Spouse’s Visa Denial Curbed by U.S. High Court.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. top court rejects wife’s challenge to Afghan husband’s visa denial.”

Sam Hananel of The Associated Press has a report headlined “Court: Spouse can’t protest husband’s visa denial.”

And on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” Nina Totenberg had a report titled “High Court Sides With Government On Spousal Visa Denial.”

In commentary, online at Bloomberg View, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay titled “For Now, There’s No Constitutional Right to Marriage.”

Online at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick has an essay titled “Supreme Court: American Woman Had No Right to Know Why Her Husband Was Denied a U.S. Visa.” And Mark Joseph Stern has an essay titled “Did Scalia and Roberts Just Reveal How They’ll Vote on Marriage Equality?”

And at ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser has an essay titled “Justice Scalia Turns Obscure Immigration Case Into A Proxy War Over Marriage Equality.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Kerry v. Din, No. 13-1402, at this link.

“Taliban Marriage Case Hints at Liberty’s Limits”: Law professor Cass R. Sunstein has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“Obamacare critics, backers mobilize efforts before Supreme Court ruling”: The Washington Post has this report.

“Stop Revering Magna Carta”: Law professor Tom Ginsburg has this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times.

In news coverage of today’s U.S. Supreme Court Order List: The Associated Press reports that “Court to rule on tribal courts’ powers over non-Indians” and “Supreme Court won’t revive North Carolina abortion law.”

Lawrence Hurley and Letitia Stein of Reuters report that “U.S. justices refuse to restore North Carolina abortion ultrasound law.” Hurley also has reports headlined “U.S. top court rejects AU Optronics over $500 million price-fixing fine” and “U.S. top court rejects Iraq bid to revive ‘oil-for-food’ lawsuit.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Abortion Curbs Voided as U.S. Supreme Court Rejects North Carolina; Rejecting the state’s appeal, the justices left intact a federal appeals court ruling that said the measure violated doctors’ speech rights.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “A gesture in favor of a woman’s abortion choice.”

Lastly, in Hittson v. Chatman, No. 14-8589, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a concurrence, in which Justice Elena Kagan joined, in the denial of certiorari. Justice Ginsburg’s concurrence suggests that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit may wish to grant rehearing en banc in Wilson v. Warden, No. 14-10681. You can access the pending rehearing petition at this link. The Eleventh Circuit has already issued this order directing a response to the rehearing petition and allowing a reply to the response. Both the response and a reply have since been filed.

“Justice Scalia finds out that if you live by the sword, you die by the sword”: Senior U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf had this post yesterday at his “Hercules and the umpire” blog.

“How Boies Did It: Relentless Focus on U.S. Unfairness to AIG.” Christie Smythe of Bloomberg News has this report.

“SCOTUS foreign antitrust cert denials show different tests for civil, criminal cases”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report today.

“A View from the Courtroom: The Goldbergs.” Mark Walsh has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

Programming note: On Monday, I will be delivering an appellate oral argument at the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Harrisburg. As a result, additional posts will not appear here until late Monday afternoon.

At 9:30 a.m. eastern time on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to issue an Order List, which can be accessed via this link shortly after that time. And starting shortly after 10 a.m. eastern time on Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to issue rulings in argued cases, which can be accessed via this link soon thereafter.

Early news of the Supreme Court’s orders and rulings can be accessed via the U.S. Law Week Twitter feed and also via the “SCOTUSblog” live blog.

“Scalia’s Originalist Sin in Passport Case”: Kenneth Jost had this post yesterday at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“Torrington judge looking forward to serving on Wyoming Supreme Court”: The Star-Herald of Scottsbluff, Nebraska has this report.

“The voice of opposition past, Justice Kennedy may save Obamacare now”: Joan Biskupic of Reuters has this report.

“The Supreme Court’s momentous abortion decision”: Irin Carmon of msnbc.com has this report.

“With Little Fanfare, Mexican Supreme Court Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage”: This front page article will appear in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Supreme Court races the clock on gay marriage, Obamacare and more”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

“Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Conversation with California Associate Justice Goodwin Liu”: The American Constitution Society has posted the video of yesterday’s conversation online at YouTube at this link.

“Looking for clues to Supreme Court’s final rulings in Ginsburg’s good mood”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg ‘Amazed’ at Icon Status at 82”: Tony Mauro has this post today at “The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.”

And Irin Carmon of msnbc.com has a report headlined “Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Natalie Portman movie about her.”

“How a sticky note helps Holly woman fight marijuana rap”: The Detroit Free Press has this report on a ruling that the Supreme Court of Michigan issued on Thursday.