“Supreme Court Hears Arguments Testing ‘One Person, One Vote'”: Nina Totenberg had this audio segment on yesterday evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”
Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News has a report headlined “Supreme Court Considers What ‘One Person, One Vote’ Means Today; Justices hear cases that could cause an upending of long-established state legislative redistricting principles.”
Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post has a report headlined “Politics Are Dominating The Supreme Court This Week; That’s Not Good; If a majority of the justices get their way, the rules of the democratic process could get tougher than ever before.”
And online at The Los Angeles Times, law professor Richard L. Hasen — author of the “Election Law Blog” — has an essay titled “Justices will get no satisfaction with a new ‘one person, one vote’ rule.”
“Supreme Court says challenge of Maryland district lines may proceed”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.
And John Fritze of The Baltimore Sun reports that “Supreme Court allows First Amendment case against Md. districts.”
“An Opening for States to Restrict Guns”: Today’s edition of The New York Times contains an editorial that begins, “To listen to the insistent harangues of many gun-rights advocates, one might imagine that the Second Amendment prohibits almost any regulation of firearms. Fortunately, a majority of the Supreme Court disagrees.”
“Trump’s Anti-Muslim Plan Is Awful. And Constitutional.” Law professor Peter J. Spiro has this essay online at The New York Times.
“Supreme Court hears Texas affirmative action challenge”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.
Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com reports that “Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Texas affirmative action case.”
And on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Morning Edition,” Nina Totenberg had an audio segment titled “Affirmative Action Fight Returns To The U.S. Supreme Court.”
