ASSoL no more: Today at WSJ.com’s “Law Blog,” Jacob Gershman has a post titled “George Mason Tinkers With Name of Scalia Law School to Avoid Awkward Acronym.”

“New York’s top court: Parents can legally eavesdrop on kids.” The Associated Press has a report that begins, “New York’s highest court says parents can legally eavesdrop on young children, establishing an exception to state law against wiretaps without the consent of at least one person on a call.”

You can access today’s 4-to-3 ruling of the Court of Appeals of New York at this link.

“Meet the Brains Behind the Effort to Get the Supreme Court to Rethink Civil Rights; Edward Blum has orchestrated a string of big cases targeting voting rights and affirmative action”: Stephanie Mencimer has this article in the March/April 2016 issue of Mother Jones magazine.

“District Fight May Persist in Texas After Supreme Court Ruling”: David Montgomery and Michael Wines have this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“GOP senator meets with Garland, says hearings should be held”: The Associated Press has this report.

“In the shadows of a presidential primary, Wisconsin is set to elect a state Supreme Court justice”: Jessie Opoien of The Capital Times of Madison, Wisconsin has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “Bradley, Kloppenburg will find out who gets high court seat.”

“John Cornyn once said ‘any nominee’ deserved vote. Now, he’s helping block Obama court pick.” Katie Leslie of The Dallas Morning News has this blog post today.

“Jury Room Racism Is Protected. It Shouldn’t Be.” Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“Constitution Check: What does ‘one-person, one-vote’ mean now?” Lyle Denniston has this post today at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.

“The Strange Career of Free Exercise: America is experiencing a revolution in religious-freedom law — transforming the rights of individual conscience into a bulwark of secular wealth and ecclesiastical power.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Supreme Court Upholds ‘One Person, One’ Vote Principle”: This audio segment featuring Nina Totenberg appeared on yesterday evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”

“Supreme Court Is Working Hard to Avoid Deadlocks, Kagan Says”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And Liz Goodwin of Yahoo! News has an article headlined “Will Alito replace Scalia as the Supreme Court’s most stinging questioner?”

“Meeting Merrick Garland to Tell Him Why G.O.P. Won’t Hold Hearings”: Michael D. Shear has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And Seung Min Kim and Burgess Everett of Politico.com report that “Conservatives pounce over Garland meetings; The backlash for Republicans who plan to meet with Obama’s nominee kicks into high gear.”

“How a Challenge to Legislative Redistricting Backfired: Advocates pushed for rules that would shift power toward older, white, more conservative areas — but they overreached, and the U.S. Supreme Court turned them down.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic.

And online at Bloomberg View, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay titled “Court Upholds ‘One Person, One Vote’ . . . Mostly.”

“Ruling: 2 Albuquerque officers can be sued for 2013 death.” The Associated Press has a report that begins, “Two Albuquerque police officers can be sued for using a stun gun on a suspect who suffered from mental illness and later died, a federal appeals court said.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit at this link.

“The Case Against the Case Against Confirmation: Why the GOP’s refusal to give Merrick Garland a fair hearing could trigger a full-scale constitutional crisis.” Slate has posted online this new installment of its “Amicus” podcast featuring Dahlia Lithwick with law professor Geoffrey R. Stone.

“U.S. Sen. Grassley to meet Garland despite opposition to nominee”: Reuters has a report that begins, “Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has invited Judge Merrick Garland to breakfast, but absent from the menu will be any promise of hearings on President Barack Obama’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

And USA Today reports that “Senators remain at stalemate over Supreme Court as they return to work.”

“Divided U.S. Supreme Court cautious about taking new cases”: Laurence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

“Supreme Court split threatens Obama’s immigration actions”: Lydia Wheeler of The Hill has an article that begins, “President Obama is facing the very real possibility of a deadlock at the Supreme Court that guarantees his immigration actions won’t take effect before he leaves office.”

“State: Supreme Court decision lumping Nebraska town in reservation separate from Riverton case.” Laura Hancock has this front page article in today’s edition of The Casper (Wyo.) Star-Tribune.

“Supreme Court to hear case of alleged racial bias by juror”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court to rule on juror’s racial bias.”

Kirk Mitchell of The Denver Post reports that “U.S. Supreme Court agrees to take up Colorado bias case; Juror in Colorado case made prejudicial remarks about Mexican men.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Court to rule on challenge to juror bias.”

“Supreme Court says federal law didn’t require Kansas sex offender leaving country to notify authorities”: Dave Helling of The Kansas City Star has this report.

“How the Supreme Court has changed since Antonin Scalia died”: Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com has this report.

“Supreme Court upholds verdict against Wells Fargo on overdraft fees in California”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Democrats make halting progress in Supreme Court clash; Jousting over Merrick Garland will intensify as senators return to Washington after a two-week recess”: Seung Min Kim and Burgess Everett of Politico.com has this report.

“Supreme Court refuses to hear Wal-Mart case; Pa. workers owed $187M”: Jane M. Von Bergen of The Philadelphia Inquirer has this report.

And Daniel Fisher of Forbes.com has a post titled “Goodbye Scalia! Supreme Court Rejects Trio Of Class-Action Challenges.”

“Justice Ginsburg Just Shut Down One Of America’s Most Notorious White Rights Activists”: Ian Millhiser has this post online at ThinkProgress.

“Dog Bites Woman. It’s a Federal Case.” Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

My earlier coverage of Friday’s Ninth Circuit ruling can be accessed here.

“Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to ‘One Person One Vote'”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court rejects conservative bid to count only voting-age population for districts.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court rejects voting-district case that would have weakened California’s clout.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Affirms ‘One-Person, One-Vote’ Standard; Ruling is blow to conservative activists who argued the Constitution forbids counting immigrants or prisoners.”

Bobby Blanchard of The Dallas Morning News has a blog post titled “Supreme Court unanimously upholds ‘one-person, one-vote’ method to draw districts in Texas case.”

Josh Gerstein of Politico.com reports that “Supreme Court rejects challenge to ‘one person, one vote’ definition.”

Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com reports that “Conservative challengers lose key Supreme Court voting rights case.”

Matt Ford of The Atlantic has an article headlined “One Person, One Vote, Eight Justices; The constitutional maxim does not require states to use eligible voters when drawing legislative districts, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday.”

Samantha Lachman of The Huffington Post reports that “Supreme Court Deals A Blow To Conservatives In Major Voting Rights Case; A different ruling would have shifted power away from Democratic-leaning areas.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Opinion analysis: Leaving a constitutional ideal still undefined.”

“Dynamics Are Shifting in an 8-Member Supreme Court”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

Senior Third Circuit Judge Dolores K. Sloviter to assume inactive status: Chief Judge Theodore A. McKee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued this news release today.

As the news release explains, due to a medical condition, Judge Sloviter “will cease participation in hearing cases, effective today.” The news release continues:

Judge Sloviter is a trailblazer. The only child of Jewish immigrants, she was born and raised in Philadelphia and has remained a lifelong resident of her beloved City. She graduated from the Philadelphia High School for Girls and enrolled at Temple University, where she majored in Economics and received her undergraduate degree in 1953. At a time when few women were encouraged to enter the legal profession, Judge Sloviter enrolled at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law, where she excelled academically. She served on the Law Review and received her LL.B. degree in 1956. Judge Sloviter had a successful career as a litigation lawyer in private practice in Philadelphia before turning to teaching in a first-wave of women to enter the newly opened door to legal academia. She joined the faculty of the Temple University School of Law in 1972 and became a professor at Temple in 1974. Her talent and passion for teaching the law has left a lasting imprint on her many students and law clerks.

The news release concludes:

Judge Sloviter is a true legal giant. Her contribution to the Court and the legal profession cannot be diminished. I speak for the entire Court family in wishing Judge Sloviter good health, and in thanking her for all that she has done for the Third Circuit. We expect and hope that she will continue to play an active role in the life of the Court through participation on court committees and other duties.

On a personal note, Judge Sloviter was always exceptionally kind in my interactions with her off of the bench, and I will miss her presence on oral argument panels.

“Supreme Court Nominee Pushes Ahead Despite Fracas”: Michael D. Shear has this front page article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

And in yesterday’s edition of that newspaper, Emmarie Huetteman had an article headlined “2 Republican Senators Revoke Support for Garland Hearings.”

Access today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court today issued rulings in two argued cases.

1. Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr. delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Nichols v. United States, No. 15-5238. You can access the oral argument via this link.

2. And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court in Evenwel v. Abbott, No. 14-940. Justice Clarence Thomas issued an opinion concurring in the judgment. And Justice Alito issued an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Justice Thomas joined in part. You can access the oral argument via this link.

In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Court upholds total population count in electoral districts.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme Court rejects conservative challenge in ‘one person, one vote’ case.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “U.S. High Court Rejects Calls to Transform Voting-Map Rules.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court upholds ‘one person, one vote.’”

And Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News reports that “Supreme Court Says States May Continue To Use Total Population In Deciding Districts.”

“Merrick Garland’s Clerks Urge Senate to Act on Nomination”: Zoe Tillman of The National Law Journal has this report. The letter from the nominee’s former law clerks can be viewed at this link.

“Justice Kagan tells criminal defense bar to go big or go home”: Steve Klepper has this post today at the “Maryland Appellate Blog.”