“The Justices Recused Themselves an Astounding 180 Times Last Term”: Fix the Court issued this news release today, along with a related chart.

“Without Dave: Life After ‘Late Show with David Letterman.'” Julie Hecht has this essay online at The New Yorker.

“The nation’s legal system needs a full Supreme Court”: Law professor Miriam Seifter has this essay online at The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

“Ruth Bader Ginsburg, No Fan of Donald Trump, Critiques Latest Term”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Chief Justice John Roberts’ game of chess”: Joan Biskupic of CNN.com has this report.

“Supreme Court scores well on religious freedom unless sexual freedom is involved”: Tad Walch of The Deseret News has an article that begins, “Experts on the final day of a BYU conference Friday strongly urged people of faith to get involved in religious freedom issues before they reach the courts.”

“Why Did Obama Do So Well at the Supreme Court? A look back at the court’s major decisions in the Obama era — and what it means for the Court’s future.” Scott Lemieux has this essay online at The New Republic.

“O’Bannon-NCAA case takes a twist in filing with Supreme Court”: Steve Berkowitz of USA Today has this report.

“If the election is about the Supreme Court, here’s a judge of interest; Minnesota Justice David Stras seems to grasp the ‘proper, limited role of the judiciary'”: Columnist D.J. Tice has this essay online at The Minneapolis Star Tribune.

“Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to speak in Big Sky”: Whitney Bermes of The Bozeman (Mont.) Daily Chronicle has this report.

“U.S. Supreme Court may be at turning point, UCI law school dean tells Newport audience”: Alex Chan of The Daily Pilot of Fountain Valley, California has this report.

“Anti-Abortion Group Presses Ahead Despite Recent Supreme Court Ruling”: Erik Eckholm has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“An Attack on Citizens United, Through the Back Door”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“[M]uch artistic expression, by its very nature, has an ambiguous relationship to the performer’s personal views”: So writes Senior Circuit Judge Bruce M. Selya in an interesting sentencing-related decision that a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued yesterday.

Judge Selya continues:

That an actress plays Lady Macbeth, or a folk singer croons “Down in the Willow Garden,” or an artist paints “Judith Beheading Holofernes,” does not, without more, provide any objective evidence of the performer’s motive for committing a crime, of his personal characteristics (beyond his ability to act, sing, or paint, as the case may be), or of any other sentencing factor.

And later in the opinion, Judge Selya observes, “This gets the grease from the goose.”

“How to Write Like Antonin Scalia: A lawyer and proud language snoot explains why good English matters and how Justice Scalia’s textualism makes headway on the Supreme Court.” Kyle Peterson has this interview with Bryan A. Garner in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

“Justice Thomas, Undaunted: After 25 years on the Court, his voice is more important than ever.” Adam J. White has this cover story in the July 18, 2016 issue of The Weekly Standard.

“Ask the authors: Graetz & Greenhouse on the Burger Court.” Ronald K.L. Collins has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Deep Dive: The Supreme Court 2016, and All Its Complexity.” The Aspen Institute has posted this video online at YouTube.

“Does the New Assault on Super PACs from Liberal ‘Dream Team’ Have a Shot? Maybe, in this Post-Scalia World.” Rick Hasen has this post at his “Election Law Blog.”

“Left, right: Thirty years ago, progressives embraced religious exemptions; No longer.” The July 9, 2016 issue of The Economist contains an article that begins, “One day after releasing their final rulings of the term, the justices of the Supreme Court returned for an encore on June 28th.”

“AP interview: Ginsburg reflects on big cases, Scalia’s death.” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“Charges dropped in Caetano v. Massachusetts Second Amendment stun gun case”: Eugene Volokh has this post today at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“Texas to require burial or cremation of aborted fetuses”: The Associated Press has a report that begins, “Texas intends to require aborted fetuses to be buried or cremated come September, adding new abortion regulations after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the state’s restrictive clinic laws.”

And Reuters reports that “Texas proposes strict new rules for disposal of aborted fetal tissue.”

“Planned Parenthood brings new challenge to Indiana abortion law”: Kristine Guerra of The Indianapolis Star has this report.

“Tracing The ‘Rise Of The Judicial Right’ To Warren Burger’s Supreme Court”: This audio segment featuring Linda Greenhouse appeared on yesterday’s broadcast of NPR’s “Fresh Air.”

“Don’t appeal Syed’s new trial”: Steven M. Klepper has this essay online at The Baltimore Sun.

“Georgia Doesn’t Have to Endorse the KKK”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“SCOTUS Scorecard Pt. 2: The Firm Side of the Story.” Adam Feldman has this post today at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog.

“Hillary Clinton and the Espionage Act: The email scandal reveals everything that’s wrong with the outdated legislation used to prosecute spies and whistleblowers.” Law professor Steve Vladeck has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“A Case of Bad Eggs Could Land You in Prison”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“‘No One Can Breathe in This Atmosphere’: Everyone should read Justice Sonia Sotomayor on how police stops are life-and-death experiences for people of color.” Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online today at Slate.

“For Acting Solicitor General, ‘continuity’ is the guiding principle”: Alexandra Gutierrez has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Can super PACs be put back in the box?” In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Matea Gold has an article that begins, “A powerhouse legal team representing a bipartisan group of congressional members and candidates is unleashing a new effort to overturn the case that birthed super PACs, part of a novel strategy to rein in the big money that has poured into campaigns since 2010.”

“Federal officials can’t hide documents on private servers: D.C. Circuit.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“The Not-So-Liberal Roberts Court”: Linda Greenhouse has this essay online today at The New York Times.