“How a Radio Shack Robbery Could Spur a New Era in Digital Privacy”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

“OT2017 #7: ‘Keys to a Valet.'” You can access today’s new installment of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Ian Samuel and Dan Epps, via this link.

“The Supreme Court’s privacy precedent is outdated”: Attorney Stephen H. Sachs has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Dad jokes on Twitter shouldn’t disqualify a judge from the federal bench”: Law professor Joshua A. Douglas has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Cops, Cellphones and Privacy at the Supreme Court”: This editorial will appear in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Some Notes on Court-Packing, Then and Now”: Neil Siegel has this guest post at the “Balkinization” blog.

And in recent related posts at that blog, Mark Tushnet has a post titled “Expanding the Judiciary, the Senate Rules, and the Small-c constitution,” while Jack M. Balkin has a post titled “Steven Calabresi dreams of judges– and more judges– and even more judges!”

“Will Supreme Court open a ‘dam burst’ of legalized sports betting?” Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

“Culling Voter Rolls: Battling Over Who Even Gets to Go to the Polls”: Michael Wines has this front page article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“Harry Pregerson, one of the most liberal federal appeals court judges in the nation, dies at 94”: Maura Dolan of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Supreme Court to decide whether Rogers can charge $100/hour to ID movie pirates”: The Canadian Press has this report.

“N.J. is prepping for legal sports betting, but what will court rule?” Brent Johnson has this front page article in today’s edition of The Newark (N.J.) Star-Ledger.

“Gay couple, devout baker take cake fight to high court”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

“The ‘Misguided’ War Against the Administrative State”: Kenneth Jost has this post at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“Supreme Court to hear arguments on federal sports gambling ban”: Gary Martin has this front page article in today’s edition of The Las Vegas Review-Journal.

“Live Free? Die? Decades-Old Fight Over N.H. Motto to Get Supreme Court Shout-Out.” Earlier this month, Lauren Chooljian of New Hampshire Public Radio had this report.

“Gorsuch establishes conservative cred in 1st year on court”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: ‘I vote for Chenery I, not Chenery II.'” Aaron Nielson has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“Why the Cake Shop Case Is So Delicious: The main ingredient in this session’s most high-profile case is free speech, not religious liberty.” Host Dahlia Lithwick speaks with Adam Liptak on the new installment of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast.

“India’s Gay Rights Activists Seize Momentum After Landmark Ruling”: Kai Schultz of The New York Times has this report.

“Man with Maine ties helps lead charge against Harvard’s admissions policy; A part-time South Thomaston resident uses funds from his nonprofits to mount lawsuits over universities’ race-based considerations”: Edward D. Murphy has this front page article in today’s edition of The Portland Press Herald.

“High court: Truck illegally seized in high-profile hit-and-run case.” James Halpin of The Citizens’ Voice of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania has this report, along with an article headlined “State supreme court ruling a second win for local law firm.”

And Bill O’Boyle of The Times Leader of Wilkes-Barre has an article headlined “Update on Loughnane case: State Supreme Court rules truck illegally seized.”

Wednesday’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania consists of a majority opinion, a concurring opinion, and a concurring and dissenting opinion.

“While eyes are on Russia, Sessions dramatically reshapes the Justice Department”: Matt Zapotosky and Sari Horwitz of The Washington Post have this report.

“Rulebooks, Playgrounds, and Endgames: A Constitutional Analysis of the Calabresi-Hirji Judgeship Proposal.” Law professor Richard Primus has this post at the Harvard Law Review Blog.

“Bending Blue Slips: Grassley’s Strategic Error.” Harsh Voruganti has this post at his blog, “The Vetting Room.”

“Trump’s judicial picks: ‘The goal is to end the progressive state’; Donald Trump is radically reshaping the same federal courts that have been the biggest bulwark against his agenda — by picking mostly white, conservative men.” Jamiles Lartey of The Guardian (UK) has this report.

“This computer game comes thanks to 2 Supreme Court justices”: Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press has this report.

“Supreme Court case could be death knell for capital punishment”: Keri Blakinger of The Houston Chronicle has this report.

“Can Republicans expand the federal judiciary through reconciliation?” David Super has this post at the “Balkinization” blog.

“Romania Gay Marriage Case Could Have Outsize Impact in Europe”: Kit Gillet had this article in Wednesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“US Supreme Court to rule on wedding cake that split America”: Sebastien Blanc of Agence France-Presse has this report.

“Ohio Supreme Court Justice Bill O’Neill does not speak for me”: Aftab Pureval, the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts in Cincinnati, has this essay online at The Cleveland Plain Dealer.

“A Conservative Plan to Weaponize the Federal Courts”: Linda Greenhouse has this essay online at The New York Times.

“Top Ten Things I Am Thankful For On Thanksgiving”: Senior U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf (D. Neb.) has this post at “Simple Justice.” The post includes a shout-out to #AppellateTwitters, in a footnote no less.

“Conservatives have a breathtaking plan for Trump to pack the courts”: Ronald A. Klain has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Washington Post.

“Judges Over Principles: The never-Trump legal movement has morphed into a push to pack the courts with Trump-selected judges.” Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.