“Georgia Supreme Court hears Sandy Springs strip club case”: Arielle Kass of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has this report.

“The Supreme Court May Revive a Legal Theory Last Used to Strike Down New Deal Laws”: Mark Joseph Stern has this essay online at Slate.

“Too Old to Be Executed? Supreme Court Considers an Aging Death Row.” Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“OT2017 #16: ‘Robots in Ireland.'” You can access today’s new installment of the “First Mondays” podcast, featuring Ian Samuel and Dan Epps, via this link.

Access today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court granted review in two new cases and called for the views of the Solicitor General in one case.

And in Wessinger v. Vannoy, No. 17-6844, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissent from the denial of certiorari.

“School of Law lawyers in ‘Making a Murderer’ case seek Supreme Court action on juvenile false confessions”: Allie Goulding of The Daily Northwestern has this report.

“Black robes and white justice: The dark sides of early Supreme Court members.” Online at The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Justice David Wecht of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has this review of Paul Finkelman‘s new book, “Supreme Injustice: Slavery in the Nation’s Highest Court.”

“No Minds Changed in Union Fees Case”: Kenneth Jost has this post at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“Where The Supreme Court Stands On Gun Laws”: This audio segment featuring Nina Totenberg appeared on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Weekend Edition Sunday.”

“Michael Screnock, Rebecca Dallet skirmish in Wisconsin Supreme Court debate”: Bill Glauber of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report.

And in today’s edition of The Wisconsin State Journal, Molly Beck has a front page article headlined “Rebecca Dallet, Michael Screnock square off in first debate.”

“Owners of Sweet Cakes file appeal with Oregon Supreme Court”: Maxine Bernstein of The Oregonian has an article that begins, “The former owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa are petitioning the Oregon Supreme Court to overturn a state Court of Appeals ruling that upheld a penalty against the business for denying a custom wedding cake to a lesbian couple.”

“Supreme Court needs to clarify gun rights under the Second Amendment”: Adam Carrington has this essay online at Fox News.

“Fane Lozman Goes to the Supreme Court, Again”: Jeffrey Toobin has this post online at The New Yorker.

“How Unions Can Survive a Supreme Court Defeat: The demise of ‘fair-share’ rules could cripple organized labor; Here’s a viable alternative.” Law professor Samuel Estreicher has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“Trump wants top court to restrain judges who block policies”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, “The Trump administration is looking for ways to deal with its recurring frustration: individual federal judges who have put the brakes on one major administration policy after another.”

“The Supreme Court Case That Could Give Tech Giants More Power”: Lina M. Khan has this essay online at The New York Times.

“In UVa law talk, Breyer talks about the need for the judiciary to think globally”: Tyler Hammel of The Daily Progress of Charlottesville, Virginia has this report.

And Tadd Luhan of The Cavalier Daily reports that “Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer talks foreign affairs at U.Va. Law School; Event centered on the Supreme Court’s role in a globalized world, importance of international law.”

“Fox News wins appeal over sharing of clips”: Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has this report.

Larry Neumeister of The Associated Press reports that “Fox News wins appeals ruling over media monitoring company.”

Christie Smythe of Bloomberg News reports that “TVEyes Loss Means Television News Revenue Is Less Under Threat.”

Brian Flood of Fox News reports that “Fox News wins copyright infringement suit against media monitoring company TVEyes.”

At the “THR, Esq.” blog of The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner has a post titled “Fox News Wins Appellate Showdown Against Service That Facilitates Sharing of TV Clips; The 2nd Circuit rejects copyright fair use arguments made by the media monitoring service TVEyes.”

John Eggerton of Broadcasting & Cable reports that “Court Says TVEyes’ Fox News Clips Not Fair Use; Says use was transformative, just not fair.”

Nick Rummell of Courthouse News Service reports that “Second Circuit Delivers Blow to News-Clip Service TVEyes.”

Online at Bloomberg View, law professor Stephen L. Carter has an essay titled “The Easy Way to Avoid Copyright Infringement: Pay; If we’re going to have the law, sometimes innovative companies will get pinched.”

And Katharine Trendacosta of Electronic Frontier Foundation has a post titled “Second Circuit Gouges TVEyes With Terrible Fair Use Ruling.”

You can access Tuesday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.

“Entire First Circuit urges Supreme Court to revisit Harmelin‘s limits on Eighth Amendment challenges to extreme adult prison sentence”: Douglas A. Berman has this post at his “Sentencing Law and Policy” blog about an opinion concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc that First Circuit Judge David J. Barron issued Tuesday, in which the all of his active judge colleagues on that court joined.

“Appeals court denies bid to reconsider ruling on Peace Cross”: Denise Lavoie of The Associated Press has a report that begins, “A federal appeals court on Thursday rejected a request to reconsider its ruling that a 40-foot-tall (12-meter) cross on a Maryland highway median just outside Washington violates the U.S. Constitution, prompting supporters of the war memorial to vow to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

You can access today’s order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying rehearing en banc by an 8-to-6 vote, and the opinions concurring therein and dissenting therefrom, at this link.

“Federal judges trade caustic words in fight over teen immigrant abortion”: Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report.

And Zoe Tillman and Ema O’Connor of BuzzFeed News report that “The Trump Administration Is Fighting In Court Over Whether Another Pregnant Undocumented Teenager Wants An Abortion.”

You can access today’s ruling of a partially divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit at this link.

“Supreme Court Justices Grill Attorneys In Sandy Hook Records Case”: Matthew Kauffman of The Hartford Courant has an article that begins, “When Adam Lanza was in fifth grade, he created an eight-chapter booklet about a brutal gun-toting woman and her son, who attacked children, soldiers and eventually, each other.”

“Fast Times At 40 Foley: Second Circuit Drama In Zarda v. Altitude Express; This history-making case generated a slew of interesting, funny, and even snarky opinions.” David Lat has this post at “Above the Law.”

“Justice Breyer Takes on the World: U.S. Supreme Court Justice Provides Candor on the Role of the Judiciary, and His Own Place in It.” Eric Williamson of the University of Virginia School of Law has this report.

The law school has posted on YouTube at this link the video of Justice Breyer’s talk earlier today.

“President Donald J. Trump Announces Bipartisan Group of Nominees to the United States Sentencing Commission”: The White House issued this news release today. The four nominees include two federal appellate judges.

“Justice Breyer’s Dire Warning: The justice seems genuinely concerned that the Supreme Court’s conservatives will strip immigrants of their constitutional rights.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Notice of Adoption of the New Federal Law Clerk Hiring Plan”: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has posted this notice online. Judges on the Second, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits have also agreed to follow this plan. The same notice appears online at Oscar.

Seventh Circuit Judge Amy C. Barrett issued her first published opinion today: You can access the decision at this link.

“California’s top court strikes down 50-year sentences for juveniles”: Maura Dolan of The Los Angeles Times has an article that begins, “The California Supreme Court decided Monday that juveniles may not be sentenced to 50 years or longer in prison for kidnapping, rape and sodomy.”

Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle reports that “State Supreme Court limits length of prison time for youth offenders.”

Jess Sullivan of The Daily Republic of Fairfield, California reports that “State Supreme Court ruling affects Solano County rape, assault case.”

Sudhin Thanawala of The Associated Press reports that “California court nixes long terms for minors who didn’t kill.”

And Ben Bradford of Capital Public Radio reports that “California Supreme Court Rules Sentencing Juveniles 50 Years Or More Cruel And Unusual.”

Justice Goodwin H. Liu wrote the majority opinion for Monday’s 4-to-3 ruling of the Supreme Court of California.

“Supreme Court To Hear Oral Argument In Sandy Hook Records Case”: Matthew Kauffman of The Hartford Courant has an article that begins, “The state Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday on whether drawings, writings and other records seized from the home of Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza must be released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by The Courant more than four years ago.”

“The Supreme Court’s Power Play Against Labor”: Linda Greenhouse has this essay online at The New York Times.