“Jackley Ready For Supreme Court Battle On Internet Tax”: Rob Nielsen of The Yankton (S.D.) Daily Press & Dakotan has this report.
And Lauren Zumbach of The Chicago Tribune reports that “Supreme Court case could make sales tax-free e-commerce sites tougher to find.”
Circuit Judge Don R. Willett has issued his first published opinion since joining the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: You can access yesterday’s ruling at this link.
“Maryland law against price-gouging by drug companies is unconstitutional, appeals court rules”: Ian Duncan of The Baltimore Sun has this report.
Peter Loftus of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Appeals Court Strikes Down Maryland’s Drug-Price-Gouging Law; Judges say law ‘would impose a significant burden on interstate commerce involving prescription drugs.’”
And Nate Raymond of Reuters reports that “U.S. appeals court strikes down Maryland drug price-gouging law.”
You can access today’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit at this link.
“Chickasaw woman selected to clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch”: The Chickasaw Nation has issued this news release (via David Lat).
“Jury convicts Tucson man in wreck that killed former county supervisor”: Caitlin Schmidt of The Arizona Daily Star has an article that begins, “A Pima County jury has convicted a Tucson man on multiple charges stemming from a 2016 crash that killed former state Senator and county supervisor, Ann Day.”
And The Associated Press reports that “Man guilty in death of former Supreme Court justice’s sister.”
“10 minutes at Supreme Court cost Wisconsin $60K”: Scott Bauer of The Associated Press has a report that begins, “Wisconsin taxpayers footed a previously unknown $60,000 bill for an attorney to argue for 10 minutes before the U.S. Supreme Court in the state’s defense of a redistricting lawsuit, records obtained by The Associated Press show.”
“Interview: Ian Samuel.” The “High School SCOTUS” blog has posted this interview online.
“2015 LSU Law graduate Ben Aguiñaga selected for U.S. Supreme Court clerkship”: LSU Law has posted online this news release.
“Banks Cannot Sue Grocery Chain Over Major Data Breach”: Lorraine Bailey of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued on Wednesday.
“Court Upholds Removal of Tigers & Lemurs From Roadside Zoo”: Matt Reynolds of Courthouse News Service has this report.
And the Animal Legal Defense Fund, a prevailing party on appeal, issued a news release titled “Precedent Setting Decision: Endangered Species Act Protects Captive Animals; Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals affirms roadside zoo’s substandard care of endangered animals violated federal law.”
You can access Wednesday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.
“Court: Syracuse tenant can sue city over water shutoff policy on landlord unpaid bills.” Julie McMahon of The Post-Standard of Syracuse, New York has this report.
And Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has a report headlined “Syracuse, N.Y. must face water shutdown lawsuit: U.S. appeals court.”
You can access Wednesday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.
“The Court will provide the audio recording and transcript of the oral argument in 17-965, Trump, President of U.S. v. Hawaii, on an expedited basis through the Court’s website.” So begins a news release that the Public Information Office of the U.S. Supreme Court issued today.
“Now, a two-front legal war over teen abortions”: Lyle Denniston has this post at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.
“Federal Judge and Jefferson Medalist Doubts Supreme Court Bias Favoring Business; Judge Frank H. Easterbrook Argues for a More Nuanced Understanding During Award Talk”: Eric Williamson of the University of Virginia School of Law has this report.
The law school has posted the video of this event on YouTube titled “The Supreme Court and Business Litigation, With Judge Frank H. Easterbrook.”
“Make No Law Podcast Episode Five: Crush.” Legal Talk Network yesterday posted online episode five of the “Make No Law” podcast from Ken White of “Popehat.” You can access the preceding four episodes of the podcast via this link.
“Of Course Trump Can Fire Mueller. He Shouldn’t.” Law professors John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash have this essay online at The New York Times.
“Nathan B. Coats named chief justice of the Colorado Supreme Court; Coats is the 46th member of the court to be named chief justice since Colorado’s 1876 statehood”: Elizabeth Hernandez of The Denver Post has this report.
“Upset about the Supreme Court’s redistricting ruling? Use the ballot box — not impeachment.” Law professors Christian A. Johnson, Michael R. Dimino Sr., and Robert C. Power have this essay online at The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
“7th Circuit kills another big data breach class action defense”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.
“Planet Fitness transgender locker room case revived by Michigan Supreme Court”: Cole Waterman of MLive.com has this report on an order that the Supreme Court of Michigan issued recently.
“Trump nominates Alabama solicitor general for federal judgeship”: Mike Cason of Alabama Media Group has this report.
“For One Supreme Court Justice, a Personal Connection to School Law”: Mark Walsh of Education Week has this report.
“The Dan Markel Case: The Markels Break Their Silence; If you’ve been following this case, tune in to Dateline NBC on Friday night.” David Lat has this post at “Above the Law.”
And The Tallahassee Democrat reports that “Parents of slain FSU law professor Dan Markel speaking on Dateline.”
You can view the video preview of tomorrow night’s broadcast on YouTube at this link.
“Look to Supreme Court for answers on whether Trump can fire Mueller”: Law professor Richard J. Pierce has this essay online at The Hill.
“States Shouldn’t Tax Interstate Online Sales”: Law professor Richard Epstein has this post at Ricochet.
“On the ‘Correctness’ of Brown v. Board of Education”: Harsh Voruganti has this post at his blog, “The Vetting Room.”
Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that “Trump judicial nominee refuses to say if landmark civil rights opinion was correctly decided.”
And Drew Broach of The Times-Picayune of New Orleans has an article headlined “Wendy Vitter won’t say if Supreme Court was right to outlaw segregated schools.”
“South Dakota SCOTUS case could change how states tax online retailers. How’d we get here?” Dana Ferguson and Jonathan Ellis of The Argus Leader of Sioux Falls, South Dakota have this report.
“Wisconsin Film Festival: ‘RBG’ shows how the Supreme Court Justice Gins-burned chauvinism.” Rob Thomas of The Cap Times of Madison, Wisconsin has this report.
“Neil Gorsuch Votes Like Scalia; He talks like Elena Kagan”: Alexander Dolšak Prakash has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.
“Why Judges Are Above the Law: The horrifying legacy of the Supreme Court’s Stump v. Sparkman ruling.” Rob Gunther has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.
“Jonathan Ellis L’10 joins Solicitor General’s Office, argues before Supreme Court”: Penn Law has this report.
“Justice Neil Gorsuch’s first year was exactly what conservatives hoped”: Cleta Mitchell has this essay online at The Hill.
“Dissenting Against the Supreme Court’s Rightward Shift”: Linda Greenhouse has this essay online at The New York Times.
“Appeals Court Skeptical of Mulvaney’s Ability to Independently Lead CFPB; Interim director is ‘wearing two hats’ by also heading Office of Management and Budget, judge says”: Lalita Clozel of The Wall Street Journal has this report.
Glenn Thrush and Alan Rappeport of The New York Times report that “Appeals Court Questions Dual Roles of Consumer Bureau’s Director.”
Jim Puzzanghera of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Federal judges indicate they could remove Mulvaney as acting CFPB chief.”
Sommer Brokaw of UPI reports that “Judges weigh in on leadership battle at U.S. consumer agency.”
And Lydia Wheeler of The Hill reports that “Federal appeals court weighs CFPB leadership fight.”
You can access via this link the audio of today’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Back home after a most enjoyable visit to Washington, DC: Last night, I had the pleasure of being a panelist at a Coke Appellate Inn of Court meeting focusing on appellate blogging and #AppellateTwitter with co-panelists Kannon Shanmugan, Sean Marotta, and Jaime Santos.
I have had the pleasure of speaking to numerous appellate-related audiences over the years, but I doubt that I have ever visited a group containing more long-term and enthusiastic readers of this blog than last night’s attendees. It was my great pleasure to attend the program, see so many friends from the past, and meet plenty of new friends, some of whom also have or had a presence online. It somehow took me nearly 16 years since this blog’s creation to attend a Coke Appellate Inn meeting, but I hope to return much sooner for another visit. A photo of last night’s panel, including moderator Kelsi Brown Corkran, can be viewed at this link.
Before yesterday evening’s event, I had the pleasure of visiting Nationals Park to see the Atlanta Braves at the Washington Nationals. Here’s the view from my seat. Demonstrating the often unexpected reach of #AppellateTwitter, as a result of a reply I tweeted during my journey by train to DC, a member of the National’s off-field staff who’s an enthusiastic U.S. Supreme Court follower contacted me saying that he would be interested to meet me in-person if I had time while I was at the game. Thanks to social media and this particular individual, a behind-the-scenes tour of Nationals Park may be on the agenda during my next visit to a ballgame there.