“The awesome teen who blogs about SCOTUS”: Alexandria Neason of Columbia Journalism Review has this wonderful article about Anna Salvatore, the founder of the “High School SCOTUS” blog.

Anna’s most recent blog post is this interview of law professor Justin Driver, whose new book is titled “The Schoolhouse Gate: Public Education, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for the American Mind.”

“Sorry, judges, we umpires do more than call balls and strikes; Calling a game requires plenty of interpretation”: Jim Evans has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“Kavanaugh hearing revealed the partisan divide, but not the nominee’s real views on the law”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this news analysis.

“Court wants to uphold historic Pensacola cross, but can’t — yet; Majority says cross should be constitutional, city says it will appeal”: The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty issued this news release today about a per curiam ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued today.

Circuit Judge Kevin C. Newsom issued an opinion concurring in the judgment calling for en banc review.

And Senior District Judge C. Ashley Royal (M.D. Ga.), sitting by designation, also issued a lengthy opinion concurring in the judgment calling for en banc review.

“Watching Brett Kavanaugh, and I like what I’m hearing”: Columnist Christine Flowers has this essay online at The Philadelphia Inquirer.

“India’s Historic Gay-Rights Ruling and the Slow March of Progress”: Samanth Subramanian has this post online at The New Yorker.

“At His Supreme Court Hearing, Brett Kavanaugh Provides Evasive Answers on 9/11 and War Crimes”: Amy Davidson Sorkin has this post online at The New Yorker.

“Brett Kavanaugh Is Cherry-Picking the Cases He Says Count as Precedent; In his confirmation hearings, the judge is disregarding important rulings protecting abortion and same-sex marriage rights”: Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

Also online at Slate, Susan Matthews has a jurisprudence essay titled “Brett Kavanaugh Failed the Alex Kozinski Test: The Supreme Court nominee shows you don’t have to be a sexual harasser to perpetuate a system of abuse.”

Access today’s confirmation hearing of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to consider the nomination of D.C. Circuit Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh to be an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court: C-SPAN provides live coverage via this link.

And the Judiciary Committee’s own livestream can be accessed via this link.

“Newly Revealed Emails Raise Fresh Objections to Kavanaugh Confirmation”: Charlie Savage and Sheryl Gay Stolberg have this front page article in today’s edition of The New York Times. In addition, Stolberg has an article headlined “Democrats Grilling Kavanaugh Have Their Eyes on 2020.” And in commentary, columnist Paul Krugman has an op-ed titled “Kavanaugh Will Kill the Constitution; The legitimacy of the Supreme Court is on the line.”

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes, Seung Min Kim, Ann E. Marimow, and Mark Berman have a front page article headlined “Trump and questions of presidential power dominate third day of Kavanaugh hearings.” Sean Sullivan has a front page article headlined “Potential 2020 candidates use Kavanaugh hearings to show resistance to Trump.” Seung Min Kim has an article headlined “Debate boils over about ‘confidential’ Kavanaugh documents.” And the newspaper contains an editorial titled “The Kavanaugh hearing shows us just how far the Senate has fallen.”

In today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times, Jennifer Haberkorn, David G. Savage, and Sarah D. Wire have a front page article headlined “New documents released about Kavanaugh, but Trump’s high court pick is on track for confirmation.” In addition, the newspaper contains an editorial titled “Brett Kavanaugh will be our next Supreme Court justice for all the wrong reasons.”

In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Byron Tau have a front page article headlined “Kavanaugh Weathers Raucous Hearing; Supreme Court nominee rebuffs Democratic invitations to criticize President Trump’s attacks on judges, prosecutors and the media.” In addition, Tau has an article headlined “Kavanaugh Hearing: Not for Children, but Hottest Ticket in Town; Protesters, procedures and presidential ambitions combine for hours of entertainment.” And the newspaper contains an editorial titled “Cory Booker and Democratic Norms: The Senator’s political stunt to release documents backfires.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Brett Kavanaugh coasts toward Supreme Court confirmation despite document dispute, public protests.” And William Cummings reports that “Kavanaugh calls birth control ‘abortion-inducing drugs’ during confirmation hearings, sparks outrage.”

And in today’s edition of The Washington Times, David Sherfinski, Alex Swoyer, and Stephen Dinan have a front page article headlined “Accusations fly against Kavanaugh in craziest Supreme Court confirmation hearings in decades.” And Gabriella Munoz has an article headlined “Mitch McConnell: Brett Kavanaugh will be on the Supreme Court by October start date.”