How Appealing



Friday, January 4, 2019

“Supreme Court weighs whether to hear first challenge to Roe vs. Wade since Kavanaugh joined bench”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

Posted at 10:00 PM by Howard Bashman



“Restriction on transgender troops serving in military can stand for now, D.C. federal appeals court rules”: Ann E. Marimow of The Washington Post has this report.

Richard Wolf and Tom Vanden Brook of USA Today report that “Federal appeals court sides with Trump on military transgender ban, but injunctions remain in place.”

Alex Swoyer and Carlo Muñoz of The Washington Times report that “Appeals court gives Trump a win on transgender military service.”

Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press reports that “Appeals court sides with Trump in transgender military case.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. court rules for Trump on transgender military limits.”

Erik Larson of Bloomberg News reports that “Trump Administration Wins Ruling in Transgender-Ban Lawsuit.”

Rebecca Kheel of The Hill reports that “Appeals court sides with Trump on transgender military ban.”

Dominic Holden and Zoe Tillman of BuzzFeed News report that “A Court Just Ruled Trump’s Transgender Military Ban Should Take Effect, But It Won’t Change Anything Yet.”

And in commentary, online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “The Federal Judges Who Ruled in Favor of Trump’s Trans Ban Don’t Understand What It Means to Be Trans.”

You can access today’s non-precedential ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit at this link.

Posted at 9:44 PM by Howard Bashman