“Trump commutes longtime friend Roger Stone’s prison sentence”: Jill Colvin and Eric Tucker of The Associated Press have this report.

“Bostock, LGBT Discrimination, and the Subtractive Moves”: Law professor Andrew Koppelman has posted this article online at SSRN.

And at the “Balkinization” blog, Koppelman has a related post titled “Justice Alito Meets Method Acting.”

“Robert H. Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court presented by Ruth Marcus”: The Chautauqua Institution has posted this video on YouTube.

“In a blow to Gov. Tony Evers, state Supreme Court overturns three budget vetoes”: Patrick Marley and Molly Beck of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel have this report.

And Riley Vetterkind of The Wisconsin State Journal reports that “Wisconsin Supreme Court invalidates 3 of Tony Evers’ budget vetoes but keeps Scott Walker’s.”

You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin at this link.

D.C. Circuit denies Roger Stone’s request to delay his prison report date: You can access the order at this link.

Update: In early news coverage, Erik Larson of Bloomberg News reports that “Roger Stone’s Emergency Bid to Delay His Prison Term Is Denied.”

“Flynn case now paused while full appeals court considers review”: Katelyn Polantz of CNN has this report on an order that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued today.

In other coverage, Bob Fredericks of The New York Post reports that “Appeals court delays decision on dismissal of Michael Flynn charges.”

And in commentary, online at The Los Angeles Times, columnist Michael McGough has an essay titled “The judge who oversaw Michael Flynn’s case is fighting to rehear it. Good for him.”

“Justice Department plans to appeal ruling halting execution”: Michael Balsamo, Colleen Long, and Andrew DeMillo of The Associated Press have a report that begins, “The Justice Department plans to appeal a judge’s ruling that halted the first federal execution in nearly two decades after family members of the victims raised concerns they would be at high risk of coronavirus if they had to travel to attend it.”

Dartunorro Clark of NBC News reports that “Judge blocks first federal execution in 17 years over coronavirus threat to victims’ families; The victims’ families argue that Attorney General Bill Barr violated federal law when he scheduled the execution for July 13 ‘without adequate measures in place to protect them.’”

Jeff Mordock of The Washington Times reports that “Judge halts execution of convicted killer because of coronavirus concerns.”

Earlier, Sadie Gurman of The Wall Street Journal had an article headlined “First Federal Execution Since 2003 Is Set for Monday; Convicted killer Daniel Lewis Lee is scheduled to die at Terre Haute prison, despite objections from victims’ family and concerns about the coronavirus.”

Kevin Johnson of USA Today had an article headlined “Re-opening federal death chamber: Victim opposition, pandemic threaten first execution in 17 years.”

And on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Morning Edition,” Carrie Johnson had an audio segment titled “Federal Government Will Resume Executions.”

“Chief Justice John Roberts Rebuked Trump This Term. What’s He Up To?” Nina Totenberg had this audio segment on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Morning Edition.”

“Presidential Subpoenas during the Burr Trials”: Law professor Josh Blackman has posted this essay online at SSRN. Blackman refers to his essay in a post at “SCOTUSblog” titled “It must be nice to have John Marshall on your side.”

“Year of surprise Supreme Court rulings shows influence of powerful chief justice John Roberts”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

Access online the 2020 MoloLamken Supreme Court Business Briefing: Via this link.

“The Tenth Circuit on the Scope of § 1447(d) Remand Appeals; The Tenth Circuit held that when an exception to §1447(d) applies, the court can review only the expressly excepted grounds for removal”: Bryan Lammon has this post at his “final decisions” blog.

“Rulings let Trump keep his taxes under wraps for now, but his angry reaction underscores a political risk”: Toluse Olorunnipa and John Wagner have this front page article in today’s edition of The Washington Post.

“Trump Seeks to Harness Supreme Court Losses in Making 2020 Case”: Josh Wingrove and Jennifer Jacobs of Bloomberg News have this report.

“A Conservative Court and Trump’s Own Appointees Declare Their Independence; The Supreme Court’s dismissal of President Trump’s claims of immunity was a reminder that institutional prerogatives still matter in Washington, even in a time of extreme partisanship”: Peter Baker has this front page news analysis in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“With latest SJC pick, Baker faces history — and calls to meet the moment”: Matt Stout of The Boston Globe has this report.

“Chief Justice Roberts gave everyone something to call a win”: Joan Biskupic of CNN has this report.

“In L.A. case, Supreme Court rules job discrimination laws don’t protect church-school teachers”: David G. Savage has this front page article in today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.

In today’s edition of The New York Times, Adam Liptak has an article headlined “Job Bias Laws Do Not Protect Teachers in Catholic Schools, Supreme Court Rules; The case was the court’s latest consideration of the relationship between the government and religion.”

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court affirms ‘ministerial exception’ that protects religious organizations from some lawsuits.”

And Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court upholds autonomy of religious employers in employment discrimination cases.”

“Supreme Court rules Muscogee (Creek) Nation historic boundaries never disestablished by Congress”: Curtis Killman of The Tulsa World has this report, along with an article headlined “Tribal law expert calls Supreme Court’s McGirt ruling ‘most important’ in state history.”

“Supreme Court Upholds Trump Administration Regulation Letting Employers Opt Out of Birth Control Coverage; The regulation was the latest attempt to undermine the ‘contraception mandate,’ a signature initiative of the Obama administration”: Adam Liptak has this front page article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has a front page article headlined “Supreme Court says employers may opt out of Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate over religious, moral objections.”

In today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times, David G. Savage has an article headlined “Supreme Court upholds most of Trump rule to let religious employers end birth control coverage.”

In today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall have a front page article headlined “Supreme Court Rulings Expand Exemptions for Religious Employers; Justices further elevate the right of religious exercise and the role of sectarian institutions in American society, in two separate rulings.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Supreme Court allows religious, moral exemptions for employers opposed to contraceptives.”

In today’s edition of The Washington Times, Alex Swoyer has a front page article headlined “Supreme Court sides with Trump over Obamacare religious exemptions.”

And in today’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer, Jeremy Roebuck has a front page article headlined “U.S. Supreme Court hands victory to Trump in latest round of Pennsylvania’s birth-control wars.”

“The Supreme Court Teaches Trump the Limits of His Presidency”: Amy Davidson Sorkin has this post online at The New Yorker.

“Hail and farewell”: Tom Goldstein has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“The Political Genius of John Roberts: The chief justice stood up to Trump, placated Democrats, and scored indisputable points for judicial supremacy.” Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“In bias case, Jones Day pushes novel theory to block retaliation claim over press release”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this post.

“Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds most lame-duck laws, throws out provisions on government documents”: Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an article that begins, “The state Supreme Court upheld many of the lame-duck laws that limited the power of the governor and attorney general Thursday, but the justices tossed out provisions that dictated how government documents had to be written.”

Riley Vetterkind of The Wisconsin State Journal reports that “Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds most lame-duck laws curbing powers of Tony Evers, Josh Kaul.”

Todd Richmond of The Associated Press reports that “Wisconsin Supreme Court OKs GOP-authored lame-duck laws.”

And Joe Kelly of Courthouse News Service reports that “Wisconsin Justices Uphold Most GOP Lame-Duck Laws.”

You can access today’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin — totaling 144 pages — at this link.

“Judge asks appeals court to revive Michael Flynn case, permit review of DOJ dismissal”: Ann E. Marimow and Spencer S. Hsu of The Washington Post have this report.

Bryon Tau of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Judge Appeals Order to Dismiss Charges Against Michael Flynn; Former national security adviser had pleaded guilty to perjury before Justice Department moved to end case.”

Jeff Mordock of The Washington Times reports that “Trial judge in Flynn case asks appeals court to reconsider decision to drop prosecution.”

Colleen Long of The Associated Press reports that “DC judge asks for full appeal review of Flynn dismissal.”

Jan Wolfe of Reuters reports that “U.S. judge hearing Flynn case asks appeals court to reconsider dismissal.”

Pete Williams of NBC News reports that “Judge in Michael Flynn case wants full appeals court to rehear dismissal of charges; Judge Emmet Sullivan said three-judge panel’s ruling to dismiss charges against former national security adviser ‘threatens to turn ordinary judicial process upside down.’”

Katelyn Polantz of CNN reports that “Trial judge tries to keep Michael Flynn case alive in new request to appeals court.”

Gregg Re of Fox News reports that “Judge refuses to dismiss Flynn case, petitions full appellate court for review.”

Dan Mangan and Kevin Breuninger of CNBC report that “Judge asks full federal appeals court to reconsider decision forcing him to drop Michael Flynn case.”

And Harper Neidig of The Hill reports that “Judge asks appeals court to reconsider decision ordering him to dismiss Flynn charges.”

You can view at this link the petition for rehearing en banc filed today in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

“Yes, Roberts Is In the Middle. No, He’s Not a Liberal.” Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.

Access online this afternoon’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court granted review in four new cases.

“The Teflon Robe — Emboldened by Impunity: With ‘judges judging judges,’ rogues on the bench have little to fear; Secretive and cozy judicial oversight systems enable judges to subvert accountability in many states; Exhibit A: Oklahoma, where not a single judge was publicly disciplined in 14 years; When the state finally did charge a judge with wrongdoing, he was allowed to resign, his record pristine and his pension intact.” Michael Berens and John Shiffman of Reuters have this report, part two of a Reuters Investigates series.

“I join the opinion in full — even the cringy railroad puns!” So begins a concurring opinion that U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria (N.D. Cal.), sitting by designation, issued yesterday, referring to Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke‘s opinion for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

“Seventh Circuit Keeps Indiana Smokable Hemp Ban Alive”: Joe Harris of Courthouse News Service has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued yesterday.

“The President’s Statements Did Not Declassify the Existence of the Covert Program”: So holds the majority on a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in its ruling today in New York Times v. Central Intelligence Agency.

“How the idea of religious freedom is being used to undermine other rights”: Law professor Nomi Stolzenberg has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.

“People ask me if I’ve recovered from COVID-19. That’s not an easy question to answer.” David Lat has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.

“US Supreme Court rules against Oklahoma in Creek Nation case”: Chris Casteel of The Oklahoman has this report.