“The Supreme Court Ruled in Favor of Trump. And That Is OK.” Law professor William Baude has this guest essay online at The New York Times.

“Appeals court allows Texas library to remove books that triggered sex, race concerns”: Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times has this report on an en banc ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued today.

“Phila. Law Firm Evades Disqualification Over ‘Questionable’ Document Procurement; Toll Brothers sought Horn Williamson’s disqualification from the litigation after discovering that the firm had improperly obtained information about confidential settlements the defendants had entered in similar cases in the past”: Aleeza Furman of The Legal Intelligencer has this report on a unanimous, non-precedential decision that a three-judge panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued yesterday.

I briefed and argued this appeal on behalf of the Horn Williamson law firm.

Update: In other coverage, Ryan Boysen of Law360 reports that “Philly Firm Dodges DQ Despite ‘Troubling’ Discovery Conduct” (subscription required for full access).

“SCOTUS Clerk Hiring Watch: OT 2025 And Beyond; Will Justices Thomas or Alito retire under Trump? I’m betting against it.” David Lat has this post at his “Original Jurisdiction” Substack site.

“How To Save The Federal Reserve: investigating the caveat in Trump v. Wilcox.” William Baude has this post at the “Divided Argument” Substack site.

And at his “Balls & Strikes” Substack site, Jay Willis has a post titled “The Supreme Court Really Expects You to Take This Craven Horseshit Seriously; The conservative justices looked at the most embarrassing line in Bush v. Gore and thought, ‘Yeah, let’s do that again.’”