“Law-Skepticism On The New Right; A Sympathetic Critique”: Adrian Vermeule has this post at “The New Digest” Substack site.

“Companies Ask Supreme Court to Fast-Track Challenge to Tariffs; Two toy manufacturers asked the court to greatly expedite their case, in an unusual request”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Lawrence Hurley of NBC News reports that “Companies ask Supreme Court to quickly hear Trump tariffs challenge; Two toy companies are urging the justices to intervene so that they can hear oral arguments in the fall.”

And Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court Asked to Hear Challenge to Trump’s Global Tariffs.”

You can view the Petition for Writ of Certiorari before Judgment at this link.

“Trump’s lawyers anxiously await Supreme Court decision on judicial power”: Paula Reid and Casey Gannon of CNN have this report.

“Supreme Court Justices Disclose International Travel and Book Deals; Annual financial disclosures revealed some of the perks of being on the Supreme Court, including international teaching and book sales”: Abbie VanSickle of The New York Times has this report.

And Ann E. Marimow, Justin Jouvenal, and Aaron Schaffer of The Washington Post report that “Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reports $2 million payment for memoir; Financial disclosure forms for Supreme Court justices released Tuesday show their income for books, teaching and speaking engagements.”

“Trump’s First Judicial Nominees Dodge 2020 Election Question”: Tiana Headley of Bloomberg Law has this report.

“Press not exempt from law limiting publication of officials’ addresses, court rules; Journalist accused New Brunswick of unconstitutional effort to chill protected speech”: Nikita Biryukov of New Jersey Monitor has this report on a unanimous decision that the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued today.

“Justice Jackson Reports Earning Over $2 Million for Memoir”: Lydia Wheeler and Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law have this report.

“Appeals court panel appears to back Trump’s National Guard powers”: Bob Egelko and David Hernandez of The San Francisco Chronicle have this report.

Sonja Sharp of The Los Angeles Times has an article headlined “‘Occupation’ or fighting ‘rebellion’? 9th Circuit weighs Trump’s case for troops in L.A.”

Charlie Savage and Laurel Rosenhall of The New York Times report that “Appeals Court Seems Inclined to Let Trump Control National Guard in L.A. for Now; A three-judge panel sounded skeptical of California’s arguments that President Trump should return control of National Guard troops to the state.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Trump Administration Fights Order Blocking California National Guard Deployments; Appeals court scrutinizes ruling that president unlawfully federalized the state’s force in Los Angeles, over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom.”

Madlin Mekelburg and Bob Van Voris of Bloomberg News report that “Trump’s Grip on LA Troops Faces Test in Appeals Court Ruling.”

And Matt Simons of Courthouse News Service reports that “Trump tells Ninth Circuit his National Guard decisions are ‘unreviewable’ by courts; The appeal comes just over one week after California Governor Gavin Newsom sued President Donald Trump for taking control of the troops without his consent.”

You can access the video of today’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on YouTube via this link.

“What Have We Learned about Justice Barrett? Perceptions of Amy Coney Barrett may have changed more than her jurisprudence or voting record.” Jonathan H. Adler has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

And earlier at that blog, Josh Blackman had a post titled “See, I Told You So About Justice Barrett. Justice Barrett compares the Constitution to Odysseus. But I feel like Cassandra.”