“Supreme Court rejects Fane Lozman’s latest bid to force Riviera Beach to pay him millions; Fane Lozman sued Riviera Beach in 2022 over the $49 million he claimed city officials robbed him of when they made his submerged land off-limits to developers”: Hannah Phillips of The Palm Beach Post has this report.
“The incomparable Ed Kneedler”: Gregory Garre has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”
“Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty; The decision by the state attorney general’s office to retry Glossip, 62, came after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out his capital murder conviction in February”: Erik Ortiz of NBC News has this report.
“After Kennedy: pondering Eighth Amendment functioning and litigating; With states enacting new capital child rape laws, whither the Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling Kennedy v. Louisiana?” Douglas A. Berman has this post at the “Sentencing Matters Substack.”
“Deportee’s Lawyers Push for Contempt Proceedings Despite His Return; Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia’s lawyers accused the Trump administration of spending months ‘engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders’”: Alan Feuer of The New York Times has this report.
Devan Cole of CNN reports that “Abrego Garcia’s attorneys still want Trump administration officials held in contempt.”
David Rohde of NBC News has a report headlined “The questions raised by the new charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia; The potential political fallout for Democrats and why a federal prosecutor resigned days before the indictment remain unanswered.”
And today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal contains an editorial titled “Bondi Bends on Abrego Garcia; Trump averts a needless showdown with the Supreme Court by bringing him back from a prison in El Salvador.”
You can access “Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Request for Stay” at this link.
“157. A Busy (and Glitchy) Week: The Supreme Court capped off a busy week with two major late-Friday-afternoon rulings on emergency applications — and a harmless but nevertheless alarming glitch prematurely releasing today’s orders.” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.
“Federal judges are powerful. Some of their law clerks describe a toxic work culture.” Carrie Johnson had this audio segment on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Morning Edition.”
And Saturday’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered” contained an audio segment titled “Carrie Johnson on her reporting that uncovered pervasive abuse of clerks by some judges.”
“The Supreme Court Is Divided in More Ways Than You’d Think”: Law professor J. Joel Alicea has this guest essay online at The New York Times.
“Inside America’s Death Chambers: What years of witnessing executions taught me about sin, mercy, and the possibility of redemption.” Elizabeth Bruenig has this cover story in the July 2025 issue if The Atlantic.
“Judicial Notice (06.08.25): Noisy Withdrawals; Damian Williams’s departure from Paul Weiss, three notable SCOTUS rulings, the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, and another Biglaw firm opening in Boston.” David Lat has this post at his “Original Jurisdiction” Substack site.
“There Is No Musk-Trump Feud Without the Roberts Court; The original sin of selling the US justice system comes home to roost at the Supreme Court”: You can access the new episode of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast via this link.
“The Supreme Court Just Gave DOGE the Keys to the Kingdom; Allowing the department access to Social Security data means the White House can presumably share it with any federal agency it wants to leverage for political purposes”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.
“9-0, but Make It Complicated”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast via this link and on YouTube.
“Once Champions of Fringe Causes, Now in a ‘Trap of Their Own Making’; Top leaders at the Justice Department and the F.B.I. are struggling to fulfill Trump campaign promises often rooted in misinformation and conspiracy theories”: Glenn Thrush, Alan Feuer, and Adam Goldman of The New York Times have this report.
“Relocating Nationwide Injunctions”: Samuel Issacharoff and Derek T. Muller have this post at the “Just Security” blog.
“Justice Jackson Just Helped Reset the D.E.I. Debate”: Columnist David French has this essay online at The New York Times.
“Amy Coney Barrett and the Secret Legal Agenda That Played Trump Like a Chump; Even some of Trump’s own appointees have been unable to stomach some of his more lawless actions and orders, ruling against him in a variety of cases”: Paul Waldman has this essay online at The Daily Beast.
“Trump’s winning at the Supreme Court; Justice Jackson warns about ‘troubling message’; Jackson, one of the court’s most liberal justices, wrote that her colleagues may be unintentionally showing preferential treatment for the Trump administration”: Maureen Groppe of USA Today has this report.
“No Supreme Court win, but Mexico pressures U.S. on southbound guns”: Patrick J. McDonnell and Kate Linthicum of The Los Angeles Times have this report.
“How Justice Clarence Thomas led SCOTUS to kill DEI; Liberal Justice Jackson’s unanimous opinion in discrimination case echoes Thomas’s decades-long legal philosophy”: Scott Douglas Gerber has this essay online at Fox News.
“He was at the center of a Supreme Court case that changed gay marriage. Now, he’s worried.” Zach Wichter of USA Today has this report.
“Murder suspect Donna Adelson transferred to Wakulla County jail; Adelson is awaiting trial;. She’s accused of conspiring to kill FSU professor Dan Markell”: Bob Hernandez of WTXL has this report.
And Julie Montanaro of WCTV reports that “Convicted hitman in Markel murder case will soon be released from federal prison; Luis Rivera will be transported to a state prison to finish serving a 19-year sentence.”
“156. Federalizing the California National Guard; President Trump’s Saturday night ‘memorandum’ federalizing 2000 California National Guard troops is a tentative step toward abusing authorities for domestic use of the military, but a dangerous one.” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site.
“How a Supreme Court decision backing the NRA is thwarting Trump’s retribution campaign”: Devan Cole of CNN has this report.
“Trump’s Ambition Collides With Law on Sending Migrants to Dangerous Countries; Previous administrations usually considered whether a transfer would endanger the migrant or create risks for the United States and its allies”: Carol Rosenberg of The New York Times has this news analysis.
“Truth and Reconciliation”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Divided Argument” podcast via this link.
“John Roberts: 1, Stephen Miller: 0; Kilmar Abrego García’s return from an El Salvadoran prison signals a major White House change.” Columnist Jason Willick has this essay online at The Washington Post.
“Kilmar Abrego García returned to U.S., charged with human smuggling; The wrongly deported Maryland man was indicted after the government resisted court orders to return him to the United States”: Maria Sacchetti, Perry Stein, and Jeremy Roebuck of The Washington Post have this report.
Mariah Timms, Sadie Gurman, and C. Ryan Barber of The Wall Street Journal report that “U.S. Brings Abrego Garcia Back From El Salvador to Face Criminal Charges; The case over his wrongful deportation became a flashpoint in the debate over the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.”
Stephen Dinan of The Washington Times reports that “U.S. un-deports Abrego Garcia, says he will now face criminal charges.”
Devlin Barrett, Alan Feuer, and Glenn Thrush of The New York Times report that “U.S. Returns Abrego Garcia From El Salvador to Face Criminal Charges; Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, who had been living in Maryland and legally protected from deportation, had been held in a Salvadoran prison since March 15.”
And Alan Feuer of The New York Times has a news analysis headlined “Return of Wrongly Deported Man Raises Questions About Trump’s Views of Justice; For the nearly three months before the Justice Department secured an indictment against the man, it had repeatedly flouted a series of court orders to ‘facilitate’ his release from El Salvador.”
You can view the indictment at this link.
“Paul Weiss Loses Another Prominent Lawyer in Wake of Trump Deal. Damian Williams joined Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison in January shortly after stepping down as one of the nation’s top federal prosecutors. He is taking a job with Jenner & Block.” Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg of The New York Times have this report.
“The Supreme Court mistakenly emailed orders to attorneys ahead of schedule. It’s the second major technical error in a year.” John Fritze of CNN has this report.
And at “SCOTUSblog,” Amy Howe has a post titled “Supreme Court adds four cases to next term’s docket.”
You can access this evening’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court at this link.
“Interview with Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri About Judicial Selections in Trump 2.0: Will EDMO become the new NDTX?” Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”
“The Supreme Court Will Settle Trump’s Tariffs. But When? And How?” Elie Honig has this post at the “Intelligencer” blog of New York magazine.
And at the “Transnational Litigation Blog,” Robin Effron has a post titled “The Jurisdictional Battle Over Which Court Will Adjudicate the Trump Tariff Challenges.”
“‘Reverse Discrimination’ Ruling Is a Win for the Rule of Law; The Supreme Court decision isn’t a victory for conservatives or liberals”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.
And online at USA Today, columnist Dace Potas has an essay titled “There is no ‘reverse discrimination,’ people. There is only discrimination. This Supreme Court ruling makes it clear that the laws on discrimination apply to everybody equally.”
“Will White Men Rush to Court After Justices’ Latest Ruling? Not Likely. The Supreme Court on Thursday made it easier for members of so-called majority groups to bring discrimination cases, but experts say the impact is likely to be limited.” Noam Scheiber of The New York Times has this report.
“Supreme Court Rules for Straight Woman in Job Discrimination Suit; The justices rejected an appeals court’s requirement that members of majority groups meet a heightened standard to win employment discrimination cases”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.
And in commentary, online at Slate, Robyn Nicole Sanders has a Jurisprudence essay titled “Why the Supreme Court Decision Protecting a ‘Majority’ Plaintiff Was Really a Win for Civil Rights.”