“Supreme Court to review Mississippi case on alleged omission of Black jurors; The Supreme Court agreed to review the conviction of a death-row inmate who says prosecutors discriminated by excluding Black jurors during his 2006 trial”: Julian Mark of The Washington Post has this report.

“The Situation: Who is the ‘Responsible United States Attorney’ in Virginia? Such an official must exist, because the Justice Manual says her approval is required to keep indicting Letitia James.” Benjamin Wittes has this post at the “Lawfare” blog.

“Jury orders Johnson & Johnson to pay $40 million to two women in latest talc trial”: Diana Novak Jones of Reuters has this report.

And Amanda Bronstad of The Recorder reports that “Pivotal LA Trial Alleging J&J’s Baby Powder Caused Ovarian Cancer Ends in $40M Verdict; A Los Angeles Superior Court jury deliberated for one day before awarding $40 million, all compensatory damages, to two women.”

“If the Supreme Court Wants to Keep Article II Intact but Save Wiener, Here’s How”: Elias Neibart has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“SCOTUS Is About to Turbocharge Presidential Power”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast via this link and on YouTube.

“The Federal Judge at the Trump Rally; Emil Bove violated a basic tenet of judicial ethics, presumably on purpose”: Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The New Yorker.