“Neil Gorsuch naturally equipped for his spot on Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report.

Kimberly Kindy of The Washington Post has an article headlined “Pryor: Perhaps the most polarizing Supreme Court justice possibility.”

And Sari Horwitz of The Washington Post has an article headlined “Judge Thomas Hardiman has taken an unorthodox road to the federal bench.”

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: Standing.” Aaron Nielson has this post at the “Notice & Comment” blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“Conservatives feel happy about Trump’s Supreme Court options”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report. And The AP also has an item headlined “A look at the reported top contenders for the Supreme Court.”

Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com has a report headlined “Thomas Hardiman, the non-Ivy League Supreme Court candidate.”

Audrey Taylor of ABC News has a report headlined “Judge Thomas Hardiman: What You Need to Know About the Possible Supreme Court Nominee.”

Edmund DeMarche of FoxNews.com reports that “McConnell refuses to say whether ‘nuclear option’ in Supreme Court nomination is on table.”

Shane Goldmacher of Politico.com has a blog post titled “Trump says he wants Supreme Court nominee ‘who’s going to get approved.’”

And in commentary, The Wall Street Journal has an editorial titled “Trump’s Supreme Choices: William Pryor doesn’t deserve the attacks from some on the right.” The editorial concludes:

Mr. Trump could always surprise everybody by choosing someone else, or even someone off the list like the distinguished Sixth Circuit Judge Jeff Sutton. Most important is to choose a nominee with a long enough record of writing and judging so Mr. Trump’s supporters can be confident he or she will be another Scalia or Justice Thomas, not another David Souter.