“Justices Split on Decalogue Displays; Religious Intent Is Cited In Texas, Kentucky Cases Over Ten Commandments”: Jess Bravin will have this article (pass-through link) Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal.

“‘Thou shalts’ polarize court; 5-4 ruling, bitter words reflect rift among justices”: This article will appear Tuesday in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“Groups Gear Up for Supreme Court Battle”: FOXNews.com provides this report, along with a related report headlined “No Retirement News.”

“Divided Supreme Court splits Ten Commandments rulings”: Jan Crawford Greenburg will have this article Tuesday in The Chicago Tribune.

And Tuesday in The Dallas Morning News, Allen Pusey will report that “Texas wins Ten Commandments case; Capitol marker OK, but framed copies in Kentucky are not.”

In Tuesday’s issue of The Washington Post: Charles Lane will have a front page article headlined “Justices Disallow Ten Commandments in Courthouses; In Separate Decision, Court Upholds Displays on Government Land.”

And in other news, “Cable Firms Don’t Have to Share Networks, Court Rules.”

“Rehnquist still on the bench”: Newsday provides this news update.

“Don’t Stop Grokkin’; Apparent MGM v. Grokster slamdunk is really a mixed bag” Mike Godwin has this essay online today at Reason.

In Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times: Linda Greenhouse will report that “Justices Allow a Commandments Display, Bar Others” and “Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone.”

Also, Todd S. Purdum will have an article headlined “Anticipation of a Vacancy, but Silence Says Not Yet.”

“Supreme court rejects journalists’ appeal; Reporters face jail for refusing to name source”: This article appears Tuesday in The Guardian (UK).

“Ten Commandment Displays Allowed in Some Public Spaces”: This segment (transcript with link to audio) featuring The Chicago Tribune’s Jan Crawford Greenburg appeared on this evening’s broadcast of the PBS program “The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer.” You can also access audio (RealPlayer required) of Jan’s report on today’s other notable happenings at the Court.

“Saad puts 2008 heat on McCain”: Tuesday’s edition of The Hill will contain an article that begins, “Republican leaders in Michigan’s Macomb and Oakland counties are pressuring Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to win an up-or-down vote on a controversial judicial nominee from the Wolverine State. They want McCain to use his influence to persuade his colleagues to clear Henry Saad, the nominee to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who was left out of the judicial deal Senate centrists struck last month.”

“No Retirement Announcements at High Court”: Gina Holland of The Associated Press provides this updated report, in which historian David Garrow is quoted as saying that if no retirement is announced tomorrow, we can expect to see these same nine Justices back on the bench in October.

“Rulings on religious displays divide US”: This article appears Tuesday in The Telegraph (UK).

And Tuesday’s edition of The Minneapolis Star Tribune will contain an editorial entitled “Ten Commandments: Keeping the law alive.”

“Ten Commandments rulings leave both sides unsatisfied”: Stephen Henderson of Knight Ridder Newspapers provides this report.

The Los Angeles Times is reporting: David G. Savage has a news update headlined “Justices Rule File-Sharing Services Can Be Held Liable for Theft.”

And in other news, “High Court: Cable Companies Don’t Have to Share Lines.”

Available online from National Public Radio: This evening’s broadcast of “All Things Considered” contained segments entitled “High Court Allows Commandments Display” (featuring Nina Totenberg); “High Court Rules Against Grokster“; “Reporters on CIA Leak Seek Right of Appeal“; and “Supreme Court Weighs ISP Control of Data.”

And today’s broadcast of “Talk of the Nation” contained segments entitled “High Court Rulings Split on Commandment Displays” (featuring David G. Savage); “Supreme Court Rules Against Grokster” (featuring Tony Mauro); and “High Court Won’t Hear Jailed Journalists’ Case.”

RealPlayer is required to launch these audio files.

“Aguirre: Commandments rulings show Soledad cross is religious symbol.” The web site of The San Diego Union-Tribune provides a news update that begins, “San Diego’s city attorney opined Monday that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on public displays of the Ten Commandments does not help the effort to prevent the removal of the cross from atop Mount Soledad.”

“The File Sharing Fight’s Not Over: The entertainment industry won the Grokster case; But the narrow decision leaves open the possibility that other peer-to-peer services could be legal.” Roger Parloff has this essay online at Fortune.

“Court sides with police in restraining-order case”: In addition to the two articles I earlier noted here, Warren Richey will also have this article in Tuesday’s edition of The Christian Science Monitor.

And the newspaper will contain an editorial entitled “Limits of Religion in Public Life: Court acts wisely on Ten Commandments rulings.”

“Rehnquist Throws Down The Gavel, But Not The Towel; Amid speculation over Chief Justice William Rehnquist’s resignation, the Supreme Court rules on a pair of Ten Commandment cases and one on Internet file-sharing”: Time magazine provides this online report.

Available online from law.com: Tony Mauro reports on “Mixed Results in Ten Commandments Case.”

And in other news, “Justices Shake Up Landscape in High-Tech Cases” and “Justices: Can’t File Federal Suits Over State Restraining Orders.”

“Court rules against file-trading networks”: Reuters provides this report.

“Breyer casts decisive vote on religious displays; Justice: Old monuments with Commandments are OK; new displays are not.” Tom Curry, national affairs writer for MSNBC, provides this report.

“A year after ruling, Guantanamo detainees remain in legal limbo”: Frank Davies of Knight Ridder Newspapers provides this report.

“Rehnquist’s Court”: This segment (RealPlayer required) appeared today on the public radio program “The Connection.”

“Proper place for religion is outside the courtroom”: This article will appear Tuesday in The Times of London.

And CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen has an essay entitled “Deciphering The Commandment Case.”

Competitor’s internet pop-up ads don’t evidence trademark infringement, Second Circuit rules: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued this ruling today.

“Texas Commandments display OK”: Allen Pusey of The Dallas Morning News provides this update.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram provides a news update headlined “High court rules Commandments display allowable outside Capitol.”

And The San Antonio Express-News reports that “Abbott hails decision as victory for Texans, Americans.”

“Supreme Court split over Ten Commandments”: The Scripps Howard News Service provides this report.

And Bloomberg News reports that “Ten Commandments Displays Allowed by U.S. High Court.”

“Anti-class-action clause was unconscionable” in arbitration agreement, Supreme Court of California decides: At the “Arbitration Blog,” Ross Runkel has this post about a noteworthy ruling that California’s highest court issued today.

“The Protection of Homes, Small Businesses, and Private Property Act of 2005”: U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced this legislation today in the U.S. Senate. The text of Senator Cornyn’s remarks can be accessed here.

On today’s broadcast of NPR‘s “Day to Day“: The broadcast contained segments entitled “Slate’s Jurisprudence: Last Supreme Court Rulings” (featuring Emily Bazelon); “Split Supreme Court Ruling on 10 Commandments“; and “Ruling Exposes Web File-Sharing to Lawsuits.” RealPlayer is required to launch these audio files.

“US Court Backs Cable Companies on Internet Lines”: Reuters provides this report.

“Decision to bar display of faith ratchets up culture war”: Financial Times provides a news update that begins, “The Supreme Court stepped into one of the most contested fronts of the US culture war on Monday, ruling that the display of framed copies of the Ten Commandments in Kentucky courthouses crossed the constitutional line between church and state.”

“Justices Rule File-Sharing Services Can Be Held Liable for Theft”: The Los Angeles Times provides this news update.