“U.S. Supreme Court case could impact beach renourishment projects”: This article appears today in The Florida Times-Union.

“Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal of NCLB Suit”: Mark Walsh has this post today at “The School Law Blog” of Education Week.

My earlier coverage of yesterday’s en banc Sixth Circuit affirmance by an equally divided court can be accessed here.

“Suspect can be extradited, court rules; Supreme Court overturns Ontario Court of Appeal decision”: Today’s edition of The Toronto Globe & Mail contains an article that begins, “An Arizona man can be extradited on a murder charge despite the fact that evidence against him does not equate with Canadian legal requirements, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled yesterday.”

The Arizona Daily Star reports today that “Man charged in wife’s death to be extradited.”

And Bloomberg News reports that “Canada Supreme Court Orders U.S. Murder Suspect’s Extradition.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada at this link.

“Legal changes open doors to working women; Decades of action by Congress and courts broke down many of the barriers”: Pete Williams, Justice correspondent for NBC News, has this report.

“A U.K. Court Without the Wigs; New Supreme Bench, Patterned on America’s, Stirs Debate”: Cassell Bryan-Low and Jess Bravin have this article today in The Wall Street Journal.

And at YouTube, C-SPAN has posted a video titled “Opening of UK Supreme Court.”

“Clash of schools, blogs raises free-speech issues; Butler sues student; district responds to teacher’s allegations”: The Indianapolis Star contains this article today.

“Right to counsel should include competence: When a guilty plea could mean deportation, a lawyer should be able to give his client good advice.” This editorial appears today in The Los Angeles Times.

“Issue of Gableman recusal divides state Supreme Court”: Today’s edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contains an article that begins, “Justices on the deeply divided state Supreme Court hurled dueling statements this week, with one contingent accusing the other of delaying decisions on how to handle requests to force the newest member of the court off criminal cases. The fight brewing between justices comes as they wrestle with when judges must remove themselves from cases. It signals that the ethics case against the newest member, Justice Michael Gableman, may be a flashpoint for the court.”