“Sandra Day O’Connor is our Arizonan of the Decade”: This editorial will appear Sunday in The Arizona Republic.

“Chief calls for appeal of ‘misguided’ armor ruling”: Today in The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko has an article that begins, “San Francisco’s police chief is strapping on his rhetorical armor to press the state’s top cop to challenge an appeals court ruling that might make it easier for violent felons to don bulletproof vests before setting out on a crime spree.”

“Judges Gone Wild: Michigan defines judicial bias down.” This editorial appears today in The Wall Street Journal.

“Nevada Supreme Court: Pharmacies not liable in case ; Man was killed when struck by car driven by woman on prescription painkillers.” Yesterday’s edition of The Las Vegas Review-Journal contained an article that begins, “The Nevada Supreme Court ruled 5-2 Thursday that eight pharmacies in Las Vegas cannot be sued for negligence in the death of a man killed by a motorist under the influence of prescription drugs purchased at their businesses.”

The Las Vegas Sun reported yesterday that “Justices rule pharmacies not liable for drug-induced mishaps.”

The Wall Street Journal reports that “Nevada High Court Says Pharmacies Can’t Be Sued for Death.”

And The Associated Press has a report headlined “Court: Pharmacies can’t be sued in death case.”

You can access Thursday’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Nevada at this link.

In the January 2010 issue of ABA Journal magazine: Mark Hansen has an article headlined “Taking Techs to Trial: Two terms in a row, justices weigh bringing lab analysts into court.”

And John Gibeaut has an article headlined “A League of Their Own: The NFL wants to run up the score on its antitrust exemption.”

“Cellphone Searches”: Today’s edition of The New York Times contains an editorial that begins, “The Ohio Supreme Court has struck an important blow for privacy rights, ruling that the police need a warrant to search a cellphone.”

My earlier coverage of the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling can be accessed here.

“Oversight of Pa. judges is wrapped in secrecy; The Judicial Conduct Board, created to protect citizens from errant judges, is criticized as doing just the opposite”: This front page article appears today in The Philadelphia Inquirer.