“Justice Scalia and the Tea Party”: Sunday’s edition of The New York Times will contain this editorial.

“Lame-duck session hasn’t been so lame”: This front page article appears today in The Washington Post.

“Justices Offer Receptive Ear to Business Interests”: Adam Liptak will have this article Sunday in The New York Times.

“3 seek to impeach remaining high court justices”: The Des Moines Register today contains an article that begins, “Three Iowa Republican representatives are drafting a bill to launch an impeachment process to oust the four Iowa Supreme Court justices who will continue serving next year. It was unclear Friday how much support the idea has in the Legislature, where hundreds of bills fail to advance each year.”

And Reuters reports that “Iowa lawmakers target judges who struck down gay marriage ban.”

“SCC hearing means Black’s legal battle makes history”: Yesterday’s edition of Financial Post contained an article that begins, “Conrad Black’s protracted legal battle has yielded a first. With a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada Thursday to hear an appeal by a group of former Hollinger International Inc. executives who want half a dozen libel lawsuits filed by Lord Black to be blocked from proceeding in Ontario, the Montreal-born businessman becomes the only person to have legal cases dealt by both high courts in Canada and the United States in a single year.”

“Court battle”: Today’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer contains an editorial that begins, “The political stalemate over filling a vacancy on the New Jersey Supreme Court reached a new low when Justice Roberto Rivera-Soto jumped into what had been a political battle.”

“Charlotte judge Albert Diaz confirmed to U.S. Court of Appeals”: The Charlotte Observer has this news update.

“UGA grad to clerk for Supreme Court justice”: This article appears today in The Athens (Ga.) Banner-Herald.

“The Supreme Court and Obama’s Health Law”: John Schwartz will have this article Sunday in the Week in Review section of The New York Times.