“To Defend the Accused in a Tucson Rampage, First a Battle to Get Inside a Mind”: Sunday’s edition of The New York Times will contain this article.

“Orie ex-staffers claim work included politics; Defense challenges former employees’ motives, credibility”: This article appears today in The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

And The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports today that “More former Orie staffers say they did political work on state time.”

“Court wades through manure case, sides with Alberta farmer; Pipeline firm failed to restore or reclaim land”: The Calgary Herald today contains this article reporting on a ruling that the Supreme Court of Canada issued yesterday.

“Oversight led SJC to withdraw decision; Court did not address sealing of divorce case”: Jonathan Saltzman has this article today in The Boston Globe.

“Ad won’t trigger additional funds for court candidates; Opponents still seeking block to public funding”: Today’s edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contains an article that begins, “In the first test of a new campaign finance law, election officials have ruled a conservative group’s ad promoting state Supreme Court Justice David Prosser won’t trigger additional taxpayer funds for Prosser’s opponents.”

Update: The newspaper also contains an editorial entitled “We back Prosser: David Prosser is a hard-working, experienced justice; He is not the primary cause of the Supreme Court’s squabbling.”