“With Ariz. case, Supreme Court takes up campaign finance issue again”: Robert Barnes will have this article Sunday in The Washington Post.

“Union law injected into high court race; Candidates quiet, but others make it an issue”: Sunday’s edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel will contain an article that begins, “A controversial new law limiting collective bargaining is increasingly taking an outsize role in the race for a state Supreme Court seat.”

“Nominee for Federal Circuit deserves a hearing”: This editorial appears today in The Washington Post.

“Collective bargaining law published despite restraining order; Fitzgerald, Barca disagree on whether law goes into effect Saturday”: Today’s edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel contains an article that begins, “In a stunning twist, Gov. Scott Walker’s legislation limiting collective bargaining for public workers was published Friday despite a judge’s hold on the measure, prompting a dispute over whether it takes effect Saturday.”

“In Madison debate, Prosser calls Kloppenburg an ‘ideologue’; She fires back at justice’s role in Supreme Court’s divisiveness”: This article appears today in The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

And The Wisconsin State Journal reports that “Campaign ad is hot topic during Supreme Court forum.”

“Free Speech Worth Paying For”: Charles Fried and Cliff Sloan have this op-ed today in The New York Times.

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a blog post titled “Politics and public money: The Court holds oral argument Monday on the constitutionality of Arizona’s system for using public funds to subsidize some state political candidates, a case with nationwide implications.”

“Court ruling says Redskins have to caption song lyrics, too; Appeals court rules that deaf fans have right to see all game-related announcements”: Today’s edition of The Baltimore Sun contains this article reporting on a non-precedential ruling that a partially divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued yesterday.