“Virginia Thomas builds tea party network”: Politico.com has this report.

Majority on divided three-judge Fourth Circuit panel rules against so-called “frozen sperm kid”: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued this ruling today.

My post from June 2004 about a Ninth Circuit ruling that reached the opposite result can be accessed here. And a related post from January 2008 can be accessed here.

“Orlando can restrict feeding the homeless, rules 11th Circuit; Feeding the hungry may be an expression of free speech, but cities can still put ‘reasonable’ restrictions on it, ruled the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in a unanimous decision”: Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “Court upholds Orlando’s homeless feeding rules.”

You can access today’s ruling of a unanimous en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit at this link.

“Gay dads lose La. birth certificate case”: The Associated Press has this report on a ruling that the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued today.

My earlier coverage of the case appears at this link.

“Justices, Judges, Lawyers Poke Fun at Mock Trial”: Tony Mauro has this post at “The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.”

“You Call That a Trial? A Costly Superior Court Waiver Ruling.” In today’s installment of The Legal Intelligencer, Philadelphia’s daily newspaper for lawyers, appears this month’s installment of my “Upon Further Review” column.

The ruling from last month of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania that is the subject of my column this month can be accessed here.

“Students can wear ‘I ♥ Boobies’ bracelets; Judge: Easton middle school students’ jewelry is not lewd or disruptive.” The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania has this news update.

And The Associated Press reports that “‘Boobies’ bracelets ruled OK in Pa. school for now.”

I have posted online today’s opinion and order of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Now researchers can undertake to ascertain whether any previously issued judicial opinion makes more frequent use of the ♥ symbol.