“Ruling on Arizona voter requirement mixed”: The Arizona Republic has this news update.
Reuters reports that “Court says Arizona can demand voter identification.”
And Bloomberg News reports that “Arizona Voter Registration Mandate Rejected by Appeals Court.”
You can access today’s en banc ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.
“Sex tapers can thank 3rd Circuit for First Amendment protection”: Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report.
“Court considers Chevron’s request for documents in Ecuador litigation”: Lawrence Hurley of Greenwire has this report.
And at “The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times,” Mike Scarcella has a post titled “Chevron, Consulting Firm Battle In D.C. Circuit Over Documents.”
“Despite Senate Deal on Judges, Panel Finds Partisan Acrimony Worse Than Ever”: Todd Ruger has this post at “The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.”
“Court seems split on when to apply new sentences”: Jesse J. Holland of The Associated Press has this report.
And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Argument recap: A dilemma over race.”
You can access at this link the transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Dorsey v. United States, No. 11-5683.
Reuters is reporting: James Vicini has an article headlined “Supreme Court: lawyers hired by cities can seek immunity.”
And Anna Yukhananov and James Vicini report that “U.S. top court rules for generic drugmaker on patent.”
“Generic-Drug Makers Win at High Court on Brand-Name Patents”: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has this report.
Access online today’s rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in argued cases: The Court today issued two rulings in argued cases.
1. Justice Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court in Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, No. 10-844. Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a concurring opinion. You can access the oral argument via this link.
2. And Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court in Filarsky v. Delia, No. 10-1018. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sotomayor each filed a concurring opinion. You can access the oral argument via this link.
Update: In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Court rules for private lawyer hired by CA city” and “Court says patent correction needed.”
“Court revives case against pornography record-keeping laws”: Terry Baynes of Reuters has this report.
And yesterday, XBIZ Newswire posted an analysis by attorney Corey D. Silverstein headlined “What Today’s 2257 Ruling Means.”
My earlier coverage of yesterday’s Third Circuit ruling appears at this link.
“Supreme Court to Revisit ‘First-Sale’ Copyright Doctrine”: David Kravets has this post at Wired.com’s “Threat Level” blog.
And Politico.com reports that “Supreme Court takes copyright case.”
“Justices Weigh Overtime Exemption for Drug Firm Representatives”: Adam Liptak has this article today in The New York Times.
“Judges, journalists clash over courtroom tweets”: The Associated Press has this report.
“Anna Nicole Smith meets Bernie Madoff: What has Rakoff wrought?” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report.