“California to lose big if Supreme Court scraps U.S. healthcare law; The state, one of the biggest beneficiaries of the Affordable Care Act, would lose out on as much as $15 billion annually in new federal money slated to come its way”: This article appears today in The Los Angeles Times.

“High Court Rules in Two Indian Cases Affecting Education Aid”: Mark Walsh has this post at the “School Law” blog of Education Week.

“Plaintiff Crystal Ludwig is an exotic dancer challenging the nudity ordinances of Van Buren Township under 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983.” So begins an opinion that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued today. And if that’s not tantalizing enough, the outcome of the case is determined by claim preclusion.

“The holdings and implications of Williams v. Illinois“: Jeffrey Fisher has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Judge grills Apple in Google smartphone case; Injunction against Motorola would be ‘catastrophic’ — judge; Judge Richard Posner says U.S. patent system is ‘chaos’; Apple says court order would ensure even playing field”: Dan Levine of Reuters has this report.

Programming note: Due to a college visit that will have me in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania today, additional posts will appear here this evening.

“Poll: Vast support for new health care effort.” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

“Border-Zone Laptop Search Has Court Looking for Line to Draw”: Scott Graham of The Recorder has this report.

“State Bar says let illegal immigrant practice law”: Bob Egelko has this article today in The San Francisco Chronicle.