How Appealing



Friday, July 20, 2012

“A Bigger Victory Than We Knew”: In the August 16, 2012 issue of The New York Review of Books, Ronald Dworkin will have an essay that begins, “Above all, we should celebrate. The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, has left President Obama’s Affordable Care Act almost entirely intact.”

Posted at 1:05 PM by Howard Bashman



Billy Preston minus Syreeta equals concurring opinion mention: A one paragraph concurring opinion that Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown issued today begins:

An old song laments that “nothing from nothing leaves nothing.” Billy Preston, Nothing from Nothing, on The Kids and Me (A&M Records 1974). Logically, it should follow that nothing plus nothing leads to the same result. But, in the rarefied atmosphere of attorneys’ fees litigation and in light of this Court’s divided decision in New Jersey v. EPA, 663 F.3d 1279 (D.C. Cir. 2011), nothing times nothing is apparently worth a great deal.

You can access today’s complete D.C. Circuit ruling at this link.

Posted at 11:28 AM by Howard Bashman



“Oklahoma legal leaders urge Sens. Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe to seek vote on state’s judicial nominee; Senate Republicans are blocking votes for nominees to federal appeals courts, and leaders in Oklahoma’s legal community want the state’s GOP senators to intervene for Robert E. Bacharach”: This article appears today in The Oklahoman.

Posted at 11:22 AM by Howard Bashman



“Bayou Blues”: Today’s edition of The New York Times contains an editorial that begins, “An ugly fight about who should be the Louisiana Supreme Court’s next chief justice is an unsettling example of how power can trample voting rights even where they should be sacrosanct.”

Posted at 9:08 AM by Howard Bashman