“Conestoga Wood Specialties loses health care law challenge in federal court”: The Intelligencer Journal of Lancaster, Pennsylvania has this news update.

And The Associated Press reports that “Court rejects Pa. firm’s health care law challenge.”

My earlier coverage of today’s Third Circuit ruling appears at this link.

“Skepticism About the Third Circuit’s Rejection of Organizational Free Exercise Claims”: Will Baude has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“Guantanamo medics: Forced feedings aren’t torture.” Carol Rosenberg of The Miami Herald has this report today.

“The Case of the Moldy Washing Machines: The laundry litigation that could determine the future of class-action lawsuits.” Emily Bazelon has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

“Appeals court rejects Texas, industry challenge to EPA’s GHG implementation rules”: Jeremy P. Jacobs of Greenwire has this report.

My earlier coverage of today’s D.C. Circuit ruling appears at this link.

“Hazleton’s current and former mayors disspointed by immigration ruling”: The Times Leader of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania has this news update.

And The Associated Press reports that “Court reaffirms ban on Pa. city’s immigrant laws.”

My earlier coverage of today’s Third Circuit ruling appears at this link.

“New Orleans tour guides lose free speech case against city licensing rules, vow to appeal”: The Times-Picayune of New Orleans has this report.

“‘Let Us Pray’ Before Town Council Becomes High Court Case”: Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News has this report.

“U.S. court permits generic version of Teva MS drug a year sooner”: Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued today.

“U.S. appeals court rejects states’ challenge over climate rules”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report on the ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued today.

“Exxon Mobil’s $105 Million MTBE Defeat Upheld on Appeal”: Bloomberg News has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.

Following a GVR from the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit today has “again conclude[d] that both the employment and housing provisions of the Hazleton ordinances are pre-empted by federal immigration law”: I have posted online today’s lengthy Third Circuit ruling at this link.

“[W]e conclude that for-profit, secular corporations cannot engage in religious exercise”: So holds the majority on a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a ruling issued today in the Conestoga Wood Specialties case.

At “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Courts split on contraception law.”

“Ginsburg says push for voter ID laws predictable”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.