“Supreme Court tackles new affirmative action case”: Bill Mears of CNN.com has this report.
AnnArbor.com reports that “Arguments in affirmative action Supreme Court case draw U-M students to Washington D.C.”
Tuesday’s edition of The Detroit News will contain an article headlined “Gratz: Journey to end racial preferences started 16 years ago.”
Today’s broadcast of WBUR Radio’s “Here & Now” contained an audio segment titled “Supreme Court To Hear Michigan Affirmative Action Case.”
Today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times contains an editorial titled “Affirmative action’s latest test: The Supreme Court will decide whether voters may ban racial preferences at state universities.”
And columnist Stephen Henderson of The Detroit Free Press has an op-ed titled “Affirmative action ruling aside, Michigan needs to have real talk about race.”
“Gov’t moves to keep NSA surveillance lawsuit away from Supreme Court; Gov’t doesn’t want critics of NSA spying to take their case to the high court”: Joe Mullin of Ars Technica has this report.
“Louisiana’s new gun rights law considered by state Supreme Court”: The Times-Picayune of New Orleans has this news update.
“The Michigan Experiment: The affirmative-action case liberals deserve to lose.” Emily Bazelon has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.
“How Timely Are Rulings From Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court?” In today’s edition of The Legal Intelligencer — Philadelphia’s daily newspaper for lawyers — P.J. D’Annunzio has this article in which I am quoted.
“Guantanamo Bay prison camp still at work on its image”: The Washington Post has this report.
“Protecting the Speech We Hate”: Paul Sherman and Robert McNamara had this op-ed last Thursday in The New York Times.
“Should cops be able to peek at your phone?” This article appears today in The San Diego Union-Tribune.
“A Fresh Chance to Rein in Racial Preferences: The Supreme Court’s Fisher decision last spring has been largely ignored; Now the justices can strengthen it.” Richard D. Kahlenberg has this op-ed today in The Wall Street Journal.
“Inside the new Supreme Court session with the National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen”: You can access the audio from today’s broadcast of WHYY Radio’s “Radio Times with Marty Moss-Coane” at this link.
“Affirmative Action Back at the Supreme Court, With a Twist”: Ariane de Vogue has this post today at the ABC News blog “The Note.”
“Execution drugs mixed by U.S. pharmacies draw challenges from death row”: Reuters has this report.
“Education-Related Cases Part of High Court Workload”: Mark Walsh of Education Week has this report.
“Prop. 8 campaign wants disclosure laws waived”: In yesterday’s edition of The San Francisco Chronicle, Bob Egelko had an article that begins, “Supporters of California’s 2008 ban on same-sex marriage are back in court arguing for an exemption from the state’s campaign disclosure laws because of threats and harassment they said they have received from gay-rights supporters.”
You can access at this link the audio of last Friday’s oral argument before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
“Affirmative action in California: U.S. Supreme Court likely to decide fate of Proposition 209.” Howard Mintz has this article today in The San Jose Mercury News.
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “High court weighs Mich. ban on affirmative action.”
And Joan Biskupic of Reuters reports that “U.S. justices to hear race case; one side has two voices.”
“How the Supreme Court can resolve the debt ceiling crisis”: Law professor Adam H. Rosenzweig has this post today at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.
“Justice’s wheels slowed as shutdown hits courts”: The Associated Press has this report.
“Chevron goes to trial in New York over $18 billion Ecuador award”: Reuters has this report.
