How Appealing



Tuesday, November 12, 2013

“Testing limits of press privacy; A reporter refuses to disclose her sources for out-of-state story”: The Times Union of Albany, New York has this news update.

Posted at 10:46 PM by Howard Bashman



“GOP Escalates Nuclear Showdown By Filibustering Another Top Obama Judge”: Sahil Kapur of TPM DC has a report that begins, “Senate Republicans escalated the showdown over the nuclear option in dramatic fashion Tuesday with a second consecutive filibuster of a top judicial nominee, daring Democrats to put up or shut up when it comes to changing the rules.”

Posted at 6:23 PM by Howard Bashman



“Chief Judge Kozinski On The Immigrant Experience And Judging”: David Lat has this post today at “Above the Law.”

Posted at 6:05 PM by Howard Bashman



“Why Aren’t There More Black Federal Judges in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia? Why isn’t the White House doing more to nominate judges of color to sit in states like Georgia, Alabama and Florida, where minorities are severely underrepresented?” Andrew Cohen has this essay online today at The Atlantic.

Posted at 5:48 PM by Howard Bashman



“Down With Lifetime Appointments: Humans are living longer; That means judges are serving longer, too.” Adrienne LaFrance has this essay online today at Slate.

Posted at 3:28 PM by Howard Bashman



In news coverage of today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports that “Justices Leave in Place Ruling Against Abortion Ultrasound Requirement.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times reports that “Supreme Court rejects Oklahoma abortion regulation a second time.”

The Washington Post has a blog entry titled “Supreme Court lets stand Oklahoma court ruling blocking ultrasound requirement.”

Richard Wolf of USA Today reports that “Justices won’t hear Okla. appeal on medical abortions; Decision comes after state Supreme Court ruled that the law, passed in 2011 but later struck down in court, would have banned all medical abortions.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Rejects Oklahoma Abortion-Ultrasound Law; Decision Marks Second Setback for State This Month.”

Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor reports that “Oklahoma abortion law that required ultrasound: Supreme Court turns away case; The US Supreme Court action lets stand a ruling by the Oklahoma Supreme Court striking down the statute; It comes a week after the US justices dismissed an appeal involving a different Oklahoma law involving chemically induced abortions.”

Chris Casteel of The Oklahoman reports that “U.S. Supreme Court rejects Oklahoma appeal of abortion case; Without comment, the nation’s high court lets stand a decision that requiring a woman to have an ultrasound is unconstitutional.”

The Herald-Sun of Durham, North Carolina reports that “Supreme Court declines second Duke lacrosse appeal.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Oklahoma Rejected by Top Court on Ultrasound Abortion Law” and “Hyundai Rejected by Court on $11.5 Million Patent Award.”

The Associated Press reports that “High court won’t hear Okla. ultrasound case“; “Court won’t hear lacrosse players rights’ claim“; and “Court won’t overturn Rasta pictures decision.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. justices decline to hear second Oklahoma abortion case.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Court bypasses ultrasound case.”

Posted at 3:06 PM by Howard Bashman