“With sex-work ruling, Supreme Court can be on the right side of history”: Online today at The Toronto Globe and Mail, Kyle Kirkup has an essay that begins, “On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada has the opportunity to be on the right side of history when it releases its decision in Bedford, a case challenging the constitutionality of Canada’s sex-work laws.”

“Shrinking high court docket bedevils conservatives; Several key cases are dismissed for technical or legal reasons, and liberals breathe a sigh of relief; Even the upcoming test over presidential ‘recess appointments’ has lost some steam”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

“U.S. Supreme Court upholds biotech exec’s fraud conviction”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report.

“Tea party and political buttons: Supreme Court declines Minnesota case; Conservative groups, including the Minnesota North Star Tea Party Patriots, said a state election law violated voters’ free speech rights; The action by the Supreme Court lets stand a federal appeals court decision upholding the statute.” Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has this report.

“Court: Gov. Nikki Haley, SC officials can be sued for Occupy arrests.” This front page article appears today in The State of Columbia, South Carolina reporting on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued yesterday.

“Snowden says ruling vindicates leak of NSA files; He says decision that collection of phone data is unconstitutional is ‘the first of many'”: USA Today has a report that begins, “Edward Snowden said Monday that his decision to expose National Security Agency surveillance programs was vindicated by a federal judge’s ruling that the mass collection of phone data is probably unconstitutional.”

“Why shield corporations from disclosing political spending?” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report today.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has dismissed as improvidently granted Wyeth’s appeal contending that Pennsylvania law would not permit punitive damages to be awarded on a failure-to-warn claim involving an FDA-approved prescription drug: You can access today’s unanimous order of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dismissing the appeal as improvidently granted at this link.

My earlier posts about this case, in which I served as appellate counsel for plaintiffs while the case was pending at the Pa. Supreme Court, can be accessed here, here, here, and here.

From the plaintiffs’ perspective, today’s outcome is the same as a victory on the merits, in that it leaves undisturbed the Pa. Superior Court‘s decision reinstating the jury’s verdict awarding compensatory and punitive damages in plaintiffs’ favor.

“Federal Judge Rules Against N.S.A. Phone Data Program”: Charlie Savage of The New York Times has this news update.

Ann E. Marimow and Ellen Nakashima of The Washington Post have a news update headlined “Judge: NSA’s collecting of phone records is likely unconstitutional.”

David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has a news update headlined “NSA collection of telephone records violates Constitution, judge rules.”

Kevin Johnson and Richard Wolf of USA Today report that “Federal judge rules against NSA spying.”

Michael Doyle of McClatchy Washington Bureau reports that “Judge dings the NSA metadata collection program.”

David Ingram of Reuters reports that “U.S. judge rules phone surveillance program is likely unlawful.”

The Associated Press reports that “NSA phone record collection ruled unconstitutional.”

Bloomberg News reports that “NSA Phone Program Probably Unconstitutional, Judge Rules.”

At “The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times,” Zoe Tillman and Mike Scarcella have a post titled “Judge Finds NSA Surveillance ‘Almost Certainly’ Violates Privacy Rights.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Judge: NSA phone sweep likely invalid.”

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia at this link.

“Detroit bankruptcy judge allows appeal of eligibility, pension rulings”: The Detroit News has an update that begins, “A bankruptcy judge Monday allowed creditors to appeal his recent eligibility and pension rulings directly to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.”

News coverage from The Detroit Free Press can be accessed here.

And The Associated Press reports that “Judge allows appeal in Detroit bankruptcy case.”

“Stern Words for Wall Street’s Watchdogs, From a Judge”: Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Supreme Court Declines to Take Up School Bullying Case”: Mark Walsh has this post at the “School Law” blog of Education Week.

Access online today’s ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., No. 12-729. You can access the oral argument via this link.

In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Court says health plan lawsuit cutoff legal.”

Access online today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: The Court has posted the Order List at this link. The Court did not grant review in any new cases, but the Court did request the views of the Solicitor General in one case.

In early news coverage, The Associated Press reports that “High court won’t look at bullying in schools“; “Court won’t hear appeal over news release“; “Court won’t hear appeal over Mich. sore loser law“; “Court won’t hear dispute over Grand Canyon Skywalk“; and “Court won’t take Gulf spill moratorium case.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Sept. 11 Victims’ Suit Prompts U.S. Supreme Court Inquiry” and “Ex-InterMune CEO Harkonen’s Conviction Let Stand by Court.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. justices ask for Obama’s views in Sept. 11 case against banks“; “U.S. high court rejects oil spill contempt case“; and “U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear ex-InterMune CEO’s appeal” and “U.S. top court declines to review Lockheed employee class action.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Liability for 9/11 at issue.”

“In Bizarre No-Fly List Trial, Even the Verdict Might Be Top Secret”: David Kravets has this post today at Wired.com’s “Threat Level” blog.

“Medicaid filings put morals before court; Usual allies at odds in legal wrangling”: Jim Provance has this front page article today in The Toledo Blade.

“Right-to-die challenge reaches Supreme Court”: BBC News has this report.

And The Independent (UK) has an article headlined “Right-to-die case: Supreme Court hears case of Tony Nicklinson’s widow and Paul Lamb; Campaigners argue the assisted suicide ban contravenes the European Convention on Human Rights.”

“Crackdown on massage parlours spurs debate ahead of Supreme Court ruling”: The Canadian Press has this report.

According to the article, “This Friday, Canada’s top court will bring down a landmark decision on the legality of the country’s anti-prostitution laws.”

“Minnesota judges face new financial disclosure requirements; Fewer than half of state’s top judges earned outside pay last year; Alan Page made nearly $50,000”: The Minneapolis Star Tribune has this report.

“Cruel and Unusual: The lethal-injection dilemma.” Jeffrey Toobin has this comment in The Talk of the Town section of the December 23, 2013 issue of The New Yorker.

“Surveillance: Cozy or Chilling?” In the Sunday Review section of today’s edition of The New York Times, Noam Cohen has a news analysis that begins, “Last year, two literal-minded Supreme Court justices were considering whether police officers needed a warrant before placing a GPS tracking device on a suspect’s S.U.V. when they ended up having a rather fanciful argument: What would the founding fathers make of a GPS device, anyway?”

“In Press-Rights Battle, Reporter Says Accountability’s At Risk”: This audio segment appeared on this evening’s broadcast of NPR’s “All Things Considered.”

“Factual Precedents”: Law professor Allison Orr Larsen has this article in the new issue of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

“Monday’s 9/11 case hearing is closed session at Guantanamo”: Carol Rosenberg of The Miami Herald has this report.

And in the Sunday Review section of today’s edition of The New York Times, Francis X. Clines has an editorial notebook essay titled “The Guantanamo Trials, in Pastel.”

“Oklahoma gay marriage ban lawsuit pending 9 years”: The Associated Press has this report.

“Judge finds some right to have ‘sister wives'”: Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Getting personal before the Supreme Court”: Robert Barnes will have this new installment of his “The High Court” column in Monday’s edition of The Washington Post.

“Under the U.S. Supreme Court: Constitutional shoving in the high court.” Michael Kirkland of UPI has this report.

“San Jose v. MLB: Delay name of game in battle over A’s move.” In today’s edition of The San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz has an article that begins, “San Jose’s antitrust case against Major League Baseball over the long-stalled plan to move the Oakland A’s to the South Bay is now headed to a federal appeals court — but delay on a final outcome will continue to be the name of the game.”

And Henry K. Lee of The San Francisco Chronicle reports that “Judge allows San Jose A’s lawsuit appeal to proceed.”

“The death of a prosecutor: Ten years after Jonathan Luna’s body was found far from his Baltimore home, his death remains unsolved.” This front page article will appear in tomorrow’s edition of The Washington Post Magazine.

“Prosecutor misconduct and the most interesting man in the world”: Senior U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf has this post at his “Hercules and the Umpire” blog.

“Satanists, Hindus want monuments on Oklahoma Capitol grounds”: The Deseret News has an article that begins, “When the Oklahoma Legislature passed a bill in 2009 ordering that a monument of the Ten Commandments be placed on the state Capitol grounds, opponents warned the law invited trouble.”

“Federal judge overturns part of Utah’s law against polygamy”: This article appears today in The Deseret News.

In Sunday’s edition of The New York Times, John Schwartz will have an article headlined “A Utah Law Prohibiting Polygamy Is Weakened.”

The Associated Press reports that “‘Sister Wives’ family wins ruling in bigamy suit.”

And Reuters reports that “Part of Utah’s bigamy law struck down in victory for U.S. TV star.”

“Federal judge declares Utah polygamy law unconstitutional”: The Salt Lake Tribune has this news update.

You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah at this link.

“Appeals court vacates ban on US horse slaughter”: The Associated Press has a report that begins, “A federal appeals court on Friday removed a temporary ban on domestic horse slaughter, clearing the way for companies in New Mexico, Missouri and Iowa to open while an appeal of a lawsuit by animal protection groups proceeds.”

And Bloomberg News reports that “Commercial Horse Slaughter Allowed During Court Appeal.”

I have posted online at this link today’s order of a two-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.