“Federal judge strikes down Alaska’s marriage ban; state will appeal”: The Fairbanks Daily News-Miner has this update.
The Associated Press has a report headlined “Focus on 5th Circuit in gay marriage case.”
And CBC News reports that “Same-sex marriage opponents in U.S. ‘aren’t waving a white flag’; A majority of states could soon allow same-sex marriages, but opponents aren’t giving up.”
“Judge Richard A. Posner’s riposte skewers state’s flawed voter ID law”: This editorial will appear in Monday’s edition of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
“The selective reading of the Supreme Court’s decision in ‘Citizens United'”: Monday’s edition of The Washington Post will contain this editorial.
“The Big Lie Behind Voter ID Laws”: This editorial will appear in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.
“Supreme Court’s actions are monumental, but the why of its reasoning often missing”: Robert Barnes will have this article in Monday’s edition of The Washington Post.
“Federal judge rules Alaska’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional”: Alaska Dispatch News has this update.
And The Associated Press reports that “Federal judge strikes down Alaska’s marriage ban.”
You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska at this link.
“A newly-released Clinton memo reveals how presidential appointments really work”: Online at Vox, Andrew Prokop has an article that begins, “On Friday, Bill Clinton’s presidential library released a new set of previously-restricted internal documents from his administration. One of those memos, from March of 1993, gives a fascinating glimpse into how Ruth Bader Ginsburg almost wasn’t nominated for the Supreme Court.”
“President Clinton nominates Judge Richard Arnold to serve as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court”: Senior U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf has this post today at his “Hercules and the Umpire” blog.
“Supreme Court’s gay marriage decision surprised experts”: Markus Schmidt and Karin Kapsidelis have this article in today’s edition of The Richmond Times-Dispatch.
“California Supreme Court and state appeals court justices face easy election road”: Howard Mintz of The San Jose Mercury News has an article that begins, “For the two California Supreme Court justices and dozens of state appeals court justices on November’s ballot, it most definitely is not 1986.”