The Ninth Circuit has posted numerous amicus briefs filed in connection with the rehearing en banc that will occur in Garcia v. Google, Inc. You can access the amicus briefs via this link.

“Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Rules on Mercury From Power Plants”: Adam Liptak and Coral Davenport will have this article in Wednesday’s edition of The New York Times.

In Wednesday’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes will have an article headlined “Supreme Court to hear challenge to EPA’s power-plant emissions rule.”

Richard Wolf and Maureen Groppe of USA Today report that “Supreme Court to review EPA mercury emission rules.”

And in Wednesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Amy Harder and Brent Kendall will have an article headlined “Supreme Court to Review EPA Rule on Power Plant Emissions; Decision to Review Air Pollution Standards Represents a Setback for Obama Administration.” You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

In the December 2014 issue of ABA Journal magazine: Mark Walsh has an article headlined “Court to weigh whether employers must accommodate pregnant workers with the same limits as others.”

Stephanie Francis Ward has an article headlined “Prosecutors are using rap music to convince jurors of gang ties.”

Elizabeth Earl has an article headlined “Law profs develop Supreme Court predictor to better understand court decisions.”

The issue includes both the “8th Annual Blawg 100” and the “2014 Blawg 100 Hall of Fame.”

And this month’s installment of Bryan A. Garner’s “On Words” column is titled “How are your punctuation skills? Try this comparison exercise to find out.”

“4th Circuit makes new law: Remands based on fraud can be undone.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report on an en banc ruling (containing a very interesting dissent) that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued today.

“SCOTUSblog on camera: Eric Schnapper (Part four).” At this link.

Access online today’s Order List of the U.S. Supreme Court: At this link. The Court today granted review in two new cases.

In early coverage, The Associated Press reports that “High court to review EPA mercury limits” and “Court to weigh impact of disability law on police.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “EPA’s Power Plant Mercury Rule Gets Review by U.S. Supreme Court.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme court to weigh challenge to Obama mercury air pollution rule” and “U.S. justices to consider police conduct in arrest of disabled woman.”

And at “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Court to rule on disability rights, mercury pollution.”

“Split Third Circuit panel concludes Allenye error can be harmless”: Douglas A. Berman had this post at his “Sentencing Law and Policy” back on September 9, 2014 reporting on the ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued on that date.

Today, the Third Circuit issued an order granting rehearing en banc in the case.

“Do Online Death Threats Count as Free Speech?” Emily Bazelon will have this essay in this upcoming Sunday’s edition of The New York Times Magazine.

“Atheist group loses lawsuit to ban Colorado Day of Prayer”: The Washington Times has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “Colorado Supreme Court upholds Day of Prayer proclamations, reversing appeals court ruling.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Colorado at this link.

“Recount confirms Beasley’s win in NC Supreme Court race”: This article appears in today’s edition of The News & Observer of Raleigh, North Carolina.

“Kentucky Supreme Court Justice Will T. Scott says he may seek GOP nomination for governor”: The Lexington Herald-Leader has this report.

“Devil’s Advocates: Thanks to conservative Supreme Court rulings, the government must support the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and the Satanic Temple.” Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.