“Constitutional Convention Gathers Some Steam”: Albert R. Hunt has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“Arguing Abortion”: Adam Gopnik has this post online at The New Yorker.

“Online threats case to show if U.S. justices are down with rap”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

The Guardian (UK) has an article headlined “When is a threat to kill a joke? Or art? Supreme court weighs online abuse; Should courts care what Anthony Elonis really meant when he said on Facebook that he wanted to make his wife a bloody corpse?”

Newsweek reports that “Supreme Court to Tackle Rap-Inspired Online Threats.”

And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled “When Does the First Amendment Protect Threats? Many people don’t know where courts draw the line on what constitutes free speech — or what they mean by a ‘true threat.’”

“Is the Left Helping SCOTUS Destroy Obamacare? Dismissing the latest legal challenge as a debate over a typo could backfire.” Sam Baker has this article online at National Journal.

“At the Supreme Court, conflicts of interest are just a day at the office”: Gabe Roth will have this op-ed in Monday’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.

“Why Supreme Court Cases Are Marathons: Average Age for a Hearing Is Nearly Six Years.” Brent Kendall will have this article in Monday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

“Case Seeking Job Protections for Pregnant Women Heads to Supreme Court”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.

And Richard Wolf of USA Today has an article headlined “Pregnant worker’s case to test justices’ ‘blind spot.’”

“Justices weigh limits of free speech over Internet”: Sam Hananel of The Associated Press has this report.