“FDA Ruling Blocking Celebrex Generics Voided in Mylan Win”: Bloomberg News has this report on a non-precedential ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued today.

“Judge Harry Edwards Is Still Unimpressed With Legal Scholarship”: Michael Dorf had this post yesterday at “Dorf on Law.”

“State high court to take up Doe cases centered on Walker’s campaign”: Patrick Marley The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this news update.

And The Wisconsin State Journal has a news update headlined “Wisconsin Supreme Court agrees to hear ‘John Doe’ challenges.”

“Judge Who Axed Obama Immigration Actions Is No Stranger To Controversy”: Sahil Kapur has this “5 points” post at TPM.

“Review of Damon Root’s Overruled: The Long War for Control of the Supreme Court.” Ilya Somin has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

“Justice Breyer, Symposium Explore Legacies of Magna Carta”: Jeanine Cali had this post yesterday at the “In Custodia Legis” blog of the Library of Congress.

Double entendre: Howard Fischer of The Arizona Daily Star reports that “Supreme Court orders state to provide incontinence briefs.”

Fortunately for their wearers, the briefs will not have to be bound to exacting U.S. Supreme Court standards.

“The Supreme Court Ignores the Lessons of Ferguson: As the rest of the country worries about police overreach, the justices give cops yet more latitude.” Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate.

And at Bloomberg View, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay titled “For Police, Ignorance Excuses.”

“Constitution Check: How much secrecy does the First Amendment give to political donors?” Lyle Denniston has this post today at the “Constitution Daily” blog of the National Constitution Center.

“Industry’s mercury challenge could undermine attack on EPA climate rule”: Jeremy P. Jacobs of Greenwire has a report that begins, “If coal companies get their way when the Supreme Court reviews U.S. EPA’s air standards for mercury and other hazardous emissions, they could undermine their primary legal challenge to another landmark pollution rule: President Obama’s greenhouse gas limits for power plants.”

“The Case for Justice Anthony Kennedy to Retire”: Bill Scher had this essay yesterday at Real Clear Politics.

“SCOTUSblog on camera: Dahlia Lithwick (Part one).” You can view the video via this link.

“Ruling overturned on sex-change surgery for Mass. inmate”: John R. Ellement and Martin Finucane of The Boston Globe have a news update that begins, “A federal appeals court has overturned a ruling that a transgender Massachusetts prison inmate is entitled to taxpayer-funded sex change surgery.”

The Boston Herald has a news update headlined “Convicted killer Michelle Kosilek’s demand for sex-change operation rejected.”

And The Associated Press reports that “Appeals court overturns sex-change for inmate.”

You can access today’s 117-page, 3-to-2 en banc ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, consisting of a majority opinion and two dissenting opinions, at this link.

“District court declares Obama immigration action unconstitutional”: Jonathan H. Adler has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy” discussing a ruling that one of the most politically conservative judges serving on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued today.

Update: In early news coverage, Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has a blog post titled “Obama’s immigration actions ruled unconstitutional.”

Brian Bowling of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has a news update headlined “Judge uses deportation case to say Obama’s executive order is unconstitutional.”

The Associated Press reports that “US judge says Obama immigration action invalid.”

And at WSJ.com’s “Washington Wire” blog, Jacob Gershman has a post titled “A Judge Calls Obama’s Executive Action on Immigration Unconstitutional.”

Access online the contents of the Autumn 2014 issue of the Green Bag: Via this link (bobbleheads not included; you need a subscription to receive those).

Speaking of which, in yesterday’s mail I received a certificate from the Green Bag for the Chief Justice William Rehnquist bobblehead (Supp. 1).

“Senate may confirm up to 88 federal judges”: The Associated Press has this report.

“Posner pisses off plenty of people on privacy”: Senior U.S. District Judge Richard G. Kopf has this alliteratively titled post today at his “Hercules and the Umpire” blog.

“Pa. Supreme Court Sides with Cozen O’Connor in Campaign Finance Dispute”: Rick Hasen has this post at his “Election Law Blog” noting a decision that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued yesterday.

Update: In other coverage, The Philadelphia Daily news has a report headlined “PA Supreme Court: Law firm can forgive U.S. Rep. Bob Brady’s 2007 debt.”

“A Conversation with Justice Elena Kagan: A conversation between Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber and Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan” recorded November 20, 2014. You can view the video via this link.

“If uncorrected by this Court en banc or the Supreme Court, this decision, and others like it, sends a clear message to litigants: if you don’t like the factual findings of a district court, the doors of our Court are wide open to endless retrials on appeal.” So writes Circuit Judge Edward C. Prado in a dissent issued yesterday from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit‘s denial of rehearing en banc. The revised three-judge panel’s opinion in this environmental case can be accessed here.

In earlier coverage of the three-judge panel’s original ruling in the appeal, The Corpus Christi Caller-Times reported that “Court reverses ruling on whooping cranes’ deaths.”

“When the Law Gives Everybody But You a Break”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.

“Appeals court rehears copyright case over anti-Muslim film”: Victoria Kim of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

And at her “Trial Insider” blog, Pamela A. MacLean has a post titled “Copyrights, Anti-Muslim Film Rights Collide.”