“SCOTUSblog on camera: Dahlia Lithwick (Part four).” You can view the video via this link.

“Ferris Bueller’s day in the Texas Supreme Court”: Eugene Volokh has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.”

My earlier coverage appears at this link.

“Review of justices’ email after porn scandal finds nothing else inappropriate”: Peter Hall of The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania has this news update.

And Brad Bumsted of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has a news update headlined “Email review finds no improper contact between state Supreme Court justices, lawyers.”

You can access the report of the special counsel to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania regarding email exchanges with the Office of Attorney General at this link.

“U.S. court backs $2.1 million copyright award for song ‘Whoomp!'” Reuters has this report.

My earlier coverage of yesterday’s Fifth Circuit ruling can be accessed here.

“Two states sue to block Colorado marijuana markets”: Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

And at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Jonathan H. Adler has a post titled “Are Nebraska and Oklahoma just fair-weather federalists?”

My round-up posted last night of other news coverage of the lawsuit can be accessed here.

“The ‘nuclear option’ transforms Obama’s judicial legacy”: James Downie has this entry today at the “PostPartisan” blog of The Washington Post.

And at “Roll Call,” Niels Lesniewski has a blog post today titled “How the Nuclear Option Changed the Judiciary.”

Some of your favorite law blogs and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, forever linked in S.W.3d: Justice Don R. Willett of the Supreme Court of Texas issued this dissent from the denial of review today. In footnote three, Justice Willett’s dissent mentions various law blogs, including “How Appealing” and the guy who writes it.

Law professor Eugene Volokh prepared this amicus brief urging the grant of review in the case.

“Policing Vanity License Plates Is No Job for an EJIT; It Takes a Trained Eye, a Wide Vocabulary and a Dirty Mind”: Jacob Gershman had this article in yesterday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

“Should En Banc Review Correct Obvious Errors?” Richard M. Re has this post at “Re’s Judicata.”

“Lawyer Won’t Have to Pay Up After Issuing $1 Million Challenge on TV; Appeals court says the ‘offer,’ made on NBC’s ‘Dateline,’ was merely a figure of speech”: Eriq Gardner has this post at the “Hollywood, Esq.” blog of The Hollywood Reporter.

At “Concurring Opinions,” Lawrence Cunningham has a post titled “Million Dollar Reward Case Over.”

And at “Appellate Briefs,” Benjamin Gould has a post titled “A million-dollar challenge isn’t a contract, says the Eleventh Circuit.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit at this link.

“U.S. Appeals Court Expands Gun Rights; Man Committed to Mental Institution Decades Ago Can’t Be Blocked From Buying Gun”: Ashby Jones of The Wall Street Journal has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued yesterday.

You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.