“Hillsborough case at heart of Supreme Court arguments on judges’ fundraising”: The Tampa Bay Times has this report. In addition, the newspaper has an editorial titled “Keep Florida ban on judicial candidates seeking campaign cash.”
Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has an article headlined “Can judicial candidates solicit donations? Supreme Court to weigh case.”
And in Tuesday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Everett Johnson and
Paul Sherman will have an op-ed titled “Tying Up the First Amendment With Red Tape: A Supreme Court case this week challenges a Florida fundraising restriction as an arbitrary form of censorship.” You can freely access the full text of the op-ed via Google.
“Supreme Court may scale back housing discrimination law”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.
“Roberts Court could cripple another key civil rights law”: Zachary Roth of msnbc has this report today.
“The Supreme Court’s Billion-Dollar Mistake”: Law professor David Cole has this post online today at the blog of The New York Review of Books.
“Will the Roberts Court Strike Down Another Campaign-Finance Law?” Jeff Shesol has this post online today at The New Yorker.
And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled “When Can a Judge Ask, ‘Write Me a Check’? Sheltered in their bubble, the Justices will decide whether states can keep their judges from putting the arm on donors.”
“Justices weigh would-be judges’ appeals for campaign cash”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.
“The Most Sarcastic Justice”: Law professor Richard L. Hasen — author of the “Election Law Blog” — has posted this essay online at SSRN.
“Supreme Court to take up Calif. raisin case for 2nd time”: Jeremy P. Jacobs of Greenwire has this report today.
“Lawyers as heroes or goats in the fight over same-sex marriage”: Tom Goldstein has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”
“Scalia Lands at Top of Sarcasm Index of Justices. Shocking.” Adam Liptak will have this new installment of his “Sidebar” column in Tuesday’s edition of The New York Times.
“On gay marriage, Supreme Court to weigh equal rights and states’ rights”: David G. Savage has this front page article in today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times.
“The Year of Marriage Equality”: Richard Socarides has this post online at The New Yorker.
“How a once-small business made millions building the software behind Obamacare; And why it may make millions more if the Supreme Court now undercuts the law”: The Washington Post has this report.
“Justice Ann Walsh Bradley says constitutional amendment improperly being used as ‘tool to settle political scores'”: The Capital Times of Madison, Wisconsin has this report.
“Gay Marriage Case Offers G.O.P. Political Cover”: Jeremy W. Peters and Jonathan Martin have this front page article in today’s edition of The New York Times.
“Argument preview: Judges, politics, and money.” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”
Richard Wolf of USA Today has an article headlined “Justices’ choice: Free speech or judicial fairness.” In addition, David B. Rivkin Jr., and Andrew M. Grossman have an op-ed titled “Judicial candidates face loss of free speech rights: Supreme Court will hear campaign fundraising case.”
Today’s edition of The New York Times contains an editorial titled “Judges, With Hat in Hand.”
And yesterday’s edition of The Los Angeles Times contained an editorial titled “The complexities of keeping judicial candidates appearing impartial.”
