“Argument preview: Now, the third leg of the health-care stool.” Lyle Denniston has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“State’s same-sex marriage dispute now a clash of courts, experts say”: Today’s edition of The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette contains a front page article that begins, “As a federal judge considers whether to lift a stay on her ruling outlawing Arkansas’ bans on same-sex marriage, creating the potential for a second round of same-sex marriages until the issue is decided nationally, the Arkansas Supreme Court still hasn’t ruled on an appeal of a similar state-court ruling.”

“As Supreme Court Weighs Subsidies, Health-Law Opponents Face Hurdle; States backing Affordable Care Act and some legal scholars say principle that justices embraced in 2012 undermines case against insurance tax credits”: Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin will have this article in Monday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

The Charlotte Observer reports that “Fate of 500,000 in NC hangs on ACA court case; U.S. Supreme Court to hear challenge to federal health insurance exchange.”

In Monday’s edition of The Washington Post, Republican U.S. Senators Orrin Hatch, Lamar Alexander, and John Barrasso will have an op-ed titled “We have a plan for fixing health care.”

And Monday’s edition of USA Today will contain an editorial titled “If Obamacare plaintiffs win, millions lose.” In addition, presenting a contrary view, Sam Kazman will have an op-ed titled “Obamacare rule harms millions.”

“Why six words might hold the fate of Obamacare before the Supreme Court”: This article will appear in Monday’s edition of The Washington Post.

And today’s edition of The New York Times contains an item headlined “How an Adverse Supreme Court Ruling Would Send Obamacare Into a Tailspin.”

“Are the Justices ‘Perfectly Entitled’ to Discuss Wisdom of Law ‘In Lectures’ and ‘Law Review Articles’?” Josh Blackman has this post today at his blog.

“Hard Cases”: Jeffrey Toobin will have this Comment in the Talk of the Town section of the March 9, 2015 issue of The New Yorker.

“Major Supreme Court challenge threatens to gut Obamacare”: Warren Richey of The Christian Science Monitor has this report.

And Chris Casteel of The Oklahoman has an article headlined “Health insurance for nearly 100,000 Oklahomans hinges on Supreme Court case.”

“Health insurance uncertainty ahead for those with ACA plans”: Holly Fletcher of The Tennessean has this report.

“Is Supreme Court’s chief justice ready to take down ObamaCare?” The Hill has this report today.

“Supreme Court ruling could affect congressional districts in California”: David G. Savage of The Los Angeles Times has this report.

The Arizona Republic has articles headlined “Arizona’s U.S. House districts could be tossed in Supreme Court case” and “Supreme expense account: Travel tab is on taxpayers.”

And Lyle Denniston of “SCOTUSblog” has a post titled “Argument preview: Who, exactly, is ‘the legislature’?”

“Play Depicts Scalia As Supreme Court’s ‘Originalist'”: This audio segment appeared on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Weekend Edition Sunday.”

“The Notorious Ruth Bader Ginsburg Brings Harsh SCOTUS Zingers to SNL“: Andrew Kirell of Mediaite has this report.

“In Affordable Care Act case, context is key”: Columnist Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The Washington Post.

“High court case threatens independent electoral map drawers”: Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has this report.

And at Politico.com, Todd S. Purdum has an article headlined “California’s redistricting success in jeopardy? A Supreme Court case challenges independent panels that set legislative boundaries.”