“3rd Circuit orders do-over for Volvo sunroof-drainage classes”: Reuters has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued today.

“Baked in the cake: Legal battles follow gay marriage ruling.” Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

“Omnicare’s early impact: mixed and muted.” Alison Frankel’s “On the Case” from Thomson Reuters News & Insight has this report today.

“Supreme Court activism prompts conservative calls for limits on judiciary”: Cheryl Wetzstein of The Washington Times has this report.

The Washington Post has a report headlined “Cruz: Inject political process into Supreme Court decision-making.”

The Los Angeles Times reports that “Ted Cruz takes on Supreme Court in bid for Republican voters’ attention.”

Colby Bermel of National Journal has an article headlined “Ted Cruz Sits in Judgment of the Supreme Court; The Texas Republican derides Justice Anthony Kennedy’s ‘pop psychology.’”

Igor Bobic of The Huffington Post reports that “Ted Cruz Calls Gay Marriage Ruling The ‘Very Definition Of Tyranny’; The senator is ‘horrified’ by the Supreme Court’s ‘abuses.’”

The Hill reports that “Cruz pushes retention elections for Supreme Court justices.”

And msnbc.com reports that “Ted Cruz goes after Supreme Court for ‘judicial tyranny.’”

“If Obama Can’t Close Guantanamo”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

“Olson, Boies call for new federal LGBT protections”: Adam B. Lerner of Politico.com has this report.

“9 Alabama counties still not issuing gay marriage licenses”: The Associated Press has this report.

“Republican Cruz uses Senate perch to blast Supreme Court”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

“With Prejudice: Supreme Court Activism and Possible Solutions.” This Senate Judiciary Committee hearing is scheduled to begin momentarily, and you can view the video of the hearing live, online via this link.

“Appeals court OKs tossing strict North Dakota abortion law”: The Associated Press has a report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued today.

Part III of the opinion, which Circuit Judge Bobby E. Shepherd issued on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel consisting of only Republican appointees, contains a call for the U.S. Supreme Court to reevaluate its abortion jurisprudence to allow states to enact broader abortion bans.

“Appeals court rejects judge’s order that a man not have sex without contraception”: Tony Rizzo of The Kansas City Star has this report.

And The Associated Press reports that “Appeals panel rejects no-sex-without-contraception order.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at this link.

“Do religious rights trump order to issue marriage licenses? A federal judge said Monday he would rule on whether the Rowan County Clerk should be required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.” James Pilcher of The Cincinnati Enquirer has this report.

“Facebook Loses Appeal on New York Search Warrants”: James C. McKinley Jr. has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times reporting on a ruling that the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department issued yesterday.

In other coverage, The Associated Press reports that “Facebook loses in clash with prosecutors over users’ data.”

And today at “The Volokh Conspiracy,” Orin Kerr has a post titled “Facebook cannot challenge warrant on behalf of its users.”

“Critics of Solitary Confinement Are Buoyed as Obama Embraces Their Cause”: This article appears in today’s edition of The New York Times.

“Prosecutors drop case against Barry Bonds, without a conviction”: The San Francisco Chronicle has this report.

Today’s edition of The New York Times contains an article headlined “Justice Department Drops Case Against Barry Bonds.”

And The Los Angeles Times reports that “Barry Bonds says Justice Department’s decision to drop case gives him ‘great peace.’”

“FAN 69 (First Amendment News) Justice Alito discusses four First Amendment cases in Kristol interview — Free-Speech Jurisprudence Comes into Sharper Focus”: Ronald K.L. Collins has this post today at “Concurring Opinions.”

“Substitute Arguments in Constitutional Law”: Law professor Louis Michael Seidman has posted this article online at SSRN (via “Legal Theory Blog“).

“In sum, while I agree with the majority’s application of the precedent that binds our panel, that precedent is ripe for reconsideration, and we should revisit or at least reform the equitable mootness doctrine.” So concludes a 38-page concurring opinion that Third Circuit Judge Cheryl Ann Krause issued yesterday.