“Argentina Bonds Judge Rebuked in Rare Court Win for Nation”: Bloomberg News has this report on a ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.

“Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig exploring White House bid”: Nancy Scola of Politico.com has this report.

And Sam Stein of The Huffington Post has an article headlined “Larry Lessig Believes Democracy Is Screwed. So He’s Running For President To Save It. The Harvard legal scholar promised to quit if he passes his reform agenda.”

“Issue of where to move Guantanamo detainees threatens closure plan”: Adam Goldman and Missy Ryan will have this article in Tuesday’s edition of The Washington Post.

“Transgender inmate ‘kind of in shock’ about state decision to allow surgery”: Bob Egelko has this blog post today at The San Francisco Chronicle.

“Ohio judges who perform weddings can’t refuse to marry same-sex couples”: The Columbus Dispatch has this news update reporting on an advisory opinion that the Board of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court of Ohio issued on Friday.

“New or forthcoming books on the Supreme Court, including one by Justice Stephen Breyer”: Ronald Collins has this post today at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Industry, States Set to Fight EPA Greenhouse Gas Rules; Lawsuits would challenge rules requiring significant cuts in power-plant carbon emissions”: Brent Kendall and Amy Harder have this article in today’s edition of The Wall Street Journal. You can freely access the full text of the article via Google.

“Ninth Circuit Gives Unmarried Couples Double The Mortgage Interest Deduction Available To Married Couples”: Paul Caron has this post today at “TaxProf Blog” about a ruling that a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued on Friday.

Because a judge sitting by designation from another circuit provided the decisive vote on the three-judge panel, the case could have a better than average chance of attaining rehearing en banc should the IRS opt to pursue that remedy.

“Partisan Attacks on Voting Rights Tested in Court”: Kenneth Jost had this post yesterday at his blog, “Jost on Justice.”

“D.C. Circuit won’t rehear ‘origination clause’ suit against Obamacare; Plaintiffs will take fight to Supreme Court”: Tom Howell Jr. of The Washington Times has this report.

At “SCOTUSblog,” Lyle Denniston has a post titled “Health insurance mandate survives again.”

And at ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser has a post titled “Conservative Federal Judges Wave The White Flag On Obamacare.”

My earlier coverage of Friday’s D.C. Circuit order can be accessed here.

“We consider the constitutionality of a decision to impound a vehicle based on a community-caretaking justification. Such impoundments have been the topic of substantial debate and disagreement among our sibling circuits.” So began a decision that a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued on Friday.

“In a first, California agrees to pay for transgender inmate’s sex reassignment”: The Los Angeles Times has this report.

“Springfield panhandling ordinance ruled unconstitutional”: Illinois Times has this report on an opinion on panel rehearing that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued Friday.

Josh Blackman discusses Friday’s ruling in a blog post titled “7th Circuit Invalidates Anti-Panhandling Ordinances After Reed v. Town of Gilbert.”

“2nd Circuit Withdraws Earlier License Plate Opinion In Light of Supreme Court’s Walker Decision”: Howard Friedman had this post late Saturday night at his “Religion Clause” blog about a summary order that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued last Wednesday.

“In this appeal we consider whether a hyperlink to a document containing a forum selection clause may be used to reasonably communicate that clause to a consumer.” So began a ruling that a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued on Friday. The panel answered the question “yes,” requiring the plaintiff to litigate her case in Canada.