“On high court’s docket: Race, labor, politics — and abortion?” Richard Wolf will have this article in Monday’s edition of USA Today.
Ariane de Vogue of CNN.com has an article headlined “Is the Supreme Court poised for a shift to the right?”
And Josh Gerstein of Politico.com has an article headlined “5 cases to watch as Supreme Court term begins: Judges may take up cases on abortion and immigration.”
“The Supreme Court’s Next Landmark Cases”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.
“Andree Blumstein: Law wasn’t first choice for top TN lawyer.” Stacey Barchenger of The Tennessean has this profile of the Solicitor General of Tennessee.
“Cases To Watch As Supreme Court Resumes Session”: This audio segment featuring Nina Totenberg appeared on today’s broadcast of NPR’s “Weekend Edition Sunday.”
My round-up of similar coverage posted earlier today can be accessed here.
“Menendez’s defense relies on odd twist; uses Supreme Court ruling he criticized to dispute bribery charges”: In today’s edition of The Record of Hackensack, New Jersey, Salvador Rizzo has a front page article that begins, “A U.S. Supreme Court decision once assailed by Sen. Bob Menendez and campaign finance reformers is now at the center of his legal defense as he fights bribery charges.”
“Disapproval of Supreme Court Edges to New High”: Gallup issued this news release on Friday.
“In Carr brothers’ cases, U.S. Supreme Court will delve deep into the Eighth Amendment; Cases center on jury instructions and joint sentencing”: Justin Wingerter has this front page article in today’s edition of The Topeka Capital-Journal.
“U.S. Supreme Court could consider Oklahoma cases in new term; In the next few weeks, the justices are expected to decide whether to hear Oklahoma’s challenge to Colorado’s marijuana laws, an Indian gaming dispute and religious liberty cases involving Oklahoma entities challenging the contraception mandate”: Chris Casteel has this front page article in today’s edition of The Oklahoman.
“In reversal, Kane says porn emails were not newly discovered”: Craig R. McCoy and Angela Couloumbis had this article in yesterday’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer.
And in yesterday’s edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Brad Bumsted had a news analysis headlined “Kane releases emails as distraction when woes mount, analysts say.”
“SEC’s New Court Powers Aren’t Going Away”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg View.
“Will the Supreme Court Decide That Democrats Have Too Much Power? This term, the justices will hear at least three cases that could upend the partisan balance of power.” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic.
“Alabama judges use segregation-era law to avoid gay marriage”: The Associated Press has this report.
“Supreme Court Prepares to Take On Politically Charged Cases”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Monday’s edition of The New York Times.
Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Abortion, birth control, race top Supreme Court’s agenda.”
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “Supreme Court tackles hot social issues as 2016 election looms.”
And in today’s edition of The Los Angeles Times, law professors Akhil Amar and Vikram Amar have an op-ed titled “Five Supreme Court cases to watch that could make history.”