“Emails from Gov. Fallin’s office show state agencies’ struggle to respond to scrutiny over execution”: Samantha Vicent and Barbara Hoberock have this front page article in today’s edition of The Tulsa World.

And Cristian Farias of The Huffington Post has an article headlined “The Supreme Court Let A Man Die; He Was Executed With The Wrong Drug; The court placed far too much faith in Oklahoma’s disastrous lethal injection protocol in January and in June.”

“Ten Commandments decision likely to remain a monumental issue; Political groups and leaders seek donations and changes in the state constitution”: This front page article appears in today’s edition of The Tulsa World.

“Gerald Boyle takes on another high-profile case — his own”: Bruce Vielmetti of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has this report.

“Supreme Court considers reprieve for kids who kill”: Richard Wolf of USA Today has this report.

And online at The Center for Public Integrity, Katy Reckdahl has an article headlined “Split-second flash of a gun still resonates 52 years later; Henry Montgomery is at center of this week’s Supreme Court case on life sentences for juveniles.”

“Assault Weapons Ban Before U.S. Supreme Court”: Pete Williams of NBC News has this report.

“Donald Trump says his older sister isn’t interested in becoming a Supreme Court judge”: The Washington Post has this report.

“D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed: The Frank Easterbrook Edition.” Aaron Nielson had this post yesterday at the blog of the Yale Journal on Regulation.

“High court to hear whether juvenile killers should get another chance at freedom”: Riley Yates of The Morning Call of Allentown, Pennsylvania has an article that begins, “The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday in a case that could decide whether hundreds of Pennsylvania prisoners serving life in prison for murders they committed as youths deserve the chance to one day be released.”

“Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s office says it has never withheld Supreme Court emails”: In today’s edition of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Charles Thompson has an article that begins, “Attorney General Kathleen Kane’s office said Saturday that it has never withheld any emails to or from Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices from internal court or state Judicial Conduct Board reviews.”

“Was Schuette’s $2-million lesson a bargain?” Columnist Brian Dickerson of The Detroit Free Press has an essay that begins, “Bill Schuette went to the U.S. Supreme Court, and all Michigan taxpayers got was a bill for $2 million.”

“With court order, federal judge seeks to fuel debate about data encryption”: Ellen Nakashima of The Washington Post has this report.

“The Machinery of Death: The Supreme Court is taking up capital punishment in a big way this term, against a backdrop of continuing foul-ups with lethal injections by states.” You can access at this link the audio of the newest installment of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast featuring Dahlia Lithwick.

“OTM digs into the Supreme Court, an institution as secretive as it is powerful — and how we understand it through the media.” That’s the subject of this week’s hour-long broadcast of WNYC Radio’s “On the Media.” You can access the audio via this link.

“The White-Supremacist Lineage of a Yale College: The elite university still honors the South Carolina senator best known for praising the morality of slavery.” Lincoln Caplan has this essay online at The Atlantic.

“Why Roberts could be a Supreme Court wildcard”: Brianne J. Gorod has this essay online at msnbc.

Cartoon Network prevails in Android app-related video-privacy appeal: A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued this ruling on Friday.

In earlier coverage of the lawsuit and appeal, the “Online Media Daily” blog previously had posts titled “Cartoon Network Urges 11th Circuit To Reject Appeal In Video Privacy Case” and “Cartoon Network Prevails In Video-Privacy Lawsuit.”

“Efraim Diveroli’s story is so outlandish that it has inspired an article in Rolling Stone, a book, and a forthcoming comedy film.” So begins an opinion that Circuit Judge William H. Pryor, Jr. issued on Friday on behalf of a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.