“Democrats joyful over clean sweep of 3 open seats on Pennsylvania Supreme Court”: The Associated Press has this report.

Chris Palmer of The Philadelphia Inquirer has a news update headlined “Dougherty, Dems, sweep historic Supreme Court race.”

And The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has a news update headlined “Democrats post strong leads in PA Commonwealth, Superior court races.”

You can access the statewide Pennsylvania judicial election results via this link.

“U.S. justices skeptical of immigrant’s deportation appeal”: Lawrence Hurley of Reuters has this report.

You can access at this link the transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Torres v. Lynch, No. 14-1096.

“Death Penalty Foes Split Over Taking Issue to Supreme Court”: Adam Liptak will have this article in Wednesday’s edition of The New York Times.

“Democrats poised to sweep Pennsylvania Supreme Court race”: Melissa Daniels of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has this news update.

Frequently updated official election results can be accessed via this link.

“Kentucky clerk Kim Davis appeals order that put her in jail”: The Associated Press has this report.

Earlier today, I had this post linking to an online copy of the brief.

“Redskins: US has registered plenty of ‘offensive’ trademarks.” The Associated Press has this report.

Ian Shapira of The Washington Post has an article headlined “‘Take Yo Panties Off’ defense: Redskins cite other protected products in trademark appeal.”

The Hill has a report headlined “Redskins: Trademark cancellations violate the First Amendment.”

The Guardian (UK) reports that “Washington highlight porn sites to defend ‘Redskins’ name.”

Vice Sports has a post titled “Washington’s Bid to Save Racist Trademark: ‘Take Yo Panties Off’ Clothing Can Do It, Why Can’t We?”

And online at Sports Illustrated, the “Extra Mustard” blog has a post titled “We called the companies that the Redskins called offensive.”

In this post from yesterday evening, I linked to the opening brief on appeal that the Washington Redskins filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

“US Supreme Court to hear law student’s redistricting case”: The Associated Press has this report.

“Supreme Court Sits as the Grammar Police”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online today at Bloomberg View.

You can access at this link the transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Lockhart v. United States, No. 14-8358.

“Race for Pennsylvania Supreme Court Breaks Spending Record”: Joe Palazzolo has this post today at WSJ.com’s “Law Blog.”

And today at ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser has a post titled “Scandal, Explicit Emails, Behind The Most Expensive Supreme Court Race In American History.”

Polls in Pennsylvania close at 8 p.m. eastern time tonight, and “How Appealing” plans on covering the election results this evening for the three open seats on Pennsylvania’s highest court.

“Pa. Supreme Court sends review of Justice Eakin’s email to conduct board”: Karen Langley has this front page article in today’s edition of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

In today’s edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer, Angela Couloumbis and Craig R. McCoy have a front page article headlined “No high court discipline for Justice Eakin on offensive emails.”

In today’s edition of The Patriot-News of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Charles Thompson has a front page article headlined “Supreme Court’s special counsel says Justice Eakin’s emails don’t warrant emergency action.”

In today’s edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Brad Bumsted has a front page article headlined “Report: Ethics board, not Pa. high court, should evaluate justice emails.”

And The Associated Press reports that “PA Supreme Court defers probe over jurist’s emails made public by Kathleen Kane to ethics probe.”

Yesterday, the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts issued this media advisory and also posted online the Report of Special Counsel, a Statement by Justice Todd, and a Statement by Justice Stevens.

“A ‘view’ from the Courtroom: Let’s do the Time Warp again.” Mark Walsh has this post at “SCOTUSblog.”

“Supreme Court Landmark Case Schenck v. United States“: C-SPAN has posted the video of last night’s broadcast, featuring Tom Goldstein, at this link.

Rowan County, Kentucky clerk Kim Davis files opening brief on appeal to Sixth Circuit: You can access the brief, filed yesterday, via this link.

“In Religious Arbitration, Scripture Is the Rule of Law”: This lengthy front page article appears in today’s edition of The New York Times, the third and final part of a three-part series titled “Beware the Fine Print.”

And yesterday, the “Institute for Legal Reform” blog of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce had a post titled “Dog Bites Man: New York Times Prefers Lawyer-Controlled Class Actions over Fair Arbitration that Enables Individuals to Protect Themselves.”